Though Outdated Here's Another From Same Source:
>>This is an excellent article for those who follow this company. They even make detailed mention of their management shakeup. What's also neat is there's also some insight provided about the unusual trading volume that occured in Sept. Enjoy. Peter.
Monday -- October 13, 1997
Praegitzer's failure to communicate
Struggling company learns the hard way to give Wall Street the bad news
Dan Mcmillan Business Journal Staff Writer
Praegitzer Industries Inc. tells the story succinctly with the first sentence in each of its last four earnings reports: "Praegitzer Industries Inc. today announced record revenues . . ."
The sentences, however, do not continue with announcements of record, or even particularly strong, income levels. That's why some are getting a bit antsy with Praegitzer, a Dallas, Ore.-based printed circuit board manufacturer.
"If your top line is growing and your bottom line isn't, there's something wrong," said Scott Butler, an analyst with Portland-based Pacific Crest Securities.
The sluggish bottom line isn't the only problem. Wall Street wants Praegitzer to improve its communications flow, particularly when the company has bad news to share.
Praegitzer acknowledges the problem and vows to improve. Communication is an issue, Butler said. But, he added, Praegitzer is a young public company and is still learning the Wall Street dance.
The events surrounding Praegitzer's Sept. 5 announcement of a small layoff illustrates what happens when a company doesn't communicate with Wall Street.
The announcement itself seemed rather innocuous--a layoff of 105 employees, or a 6 percent work-force reduction, at the Dallas manufacturing facility. The company said the layoffs were the result of improvements in scheduling, manufacturing processes and more automation. Praegitzer continued by saying production levels would be up almost 30 percent compared with the same period a year earlier.
Typically, modest layoffs accompanied by increased production are seen as positive developments by Wall Street. At first, the stock reacted only mildly as most analysts shrugged it off.
Then John McManus of Needham & Co. in New York lowered his first- quarter earnings estimate from 17 cents per share to 10 cents per share. When word got out, the stock, which had traded as high as $15.50, dropped 11 percent in one day, to $11.63.
Other analysts were puzzled at first. But it turned out that McManus, whose firm was an underwriter of Praegitzer's IPO, had found out that first-quarter sales would be lower than previously expected. Other analysts soon followed his lead and lowered estimates.
Butler lowered his first-quarter estimate from 15 cents per share earnings on $46 million in revenues to 9 cents per share on $42.5 million in revenue. David Duley, an analyst with Portland-based Black & Co., reduced his estimate to 8 cents per share on $43 million in revenues.
Praegitzer learned a lesson: It has to do a better job communicating with the financial community. Wall Street won't necessarily hammer a company for performing poorly. But it shows no mercy to a company that doesn't meet its numbers, Butler said. Disappointments, especially when they come late in a quarter, are deadly.
"I guarantee you if you get the bad news out of the way early by the time the quarter is up they won't penalize you," he continued.
Matt Bergeron, Praegitzer's chief operating officer, acknowledged that his company could do a better job communicating with the financial community. The company needs to make sure that it gives analysts enough information to make reasonable estimates, he said. At the same time, a company can't let worries about what the analysts will think dictate its course, Bergeron said.
"The No. 1 thing is [the relationship between analyst and company] doesn't affect business, and I say that somewhat tongue-in-cheek because your stock price does affect the business."
Since the September fiasco, the stock has battled gamely upward, recently trading above $14. And that trend may more fairly represent the effects of the changes underway at Praegitzer.
Bergeron insists Praegitzer is taking steps to secure its future.
"We had the wrong leadership in place in order to execute. We should have done it better," Bergeron said.
Near the end of fiscal 1997, which ended June 30, it became apparent that some changes were needed, he said. The company ended the year with record revenue, $147.9 million, but reported a loss of 68 cents per share, which was attributed to the acquisition of a circuit board maker and improvements to facilities.
Greg Lucas, formerly vice president of technology at Zycon Corp. in Santa Clara, Calif., joined Praegitzer as senior vice president of technology, a new position. Jim O'Connor, formerly director of manufacturing at Zycon, was named vice president of operations at the Dallas division.
In other moves, Bob Schmelzer, formerly human resources manager at Penwest Ltd. in Bellevue, Wash., assumed the vice president of human resources position. And Steve Thatcher, formerly corporate director of new technology and strategic planning, was promoted to vice president of operations at the Redmond, Wash. division.
Bergeron declined to discuss the people who were let go to make way for the new management team, saying he'd rather focus on the new team.
But, he did note that the former managers served the company well when it was going through its entrepreneurial phase. Now, the company has managers who can sustain and grow a mature business, Bergeron said.
Along with new managers, Praegitzer has new and improved facilities.
The company launched an aggressive capital improvement campaign, highlighted by a $10 million investment in new equipment for its Dallas manufacturing facility, and completed a key acquisition, purchasing for $26 million Trend Circuits, a company that specializes in fast turnaround of prototype printed circuit boards, Bergeron said.
The acquisition was critical, Bergeron said. Praegitzer's strategy is to provide services from circuit board design to prototyping to volume production. Trend Circuits provides the second piece of that strategy, Bergeron said. Duley added that Trend has a good reputation for its ability to quickly turn-around small, prototype orders.
"When Trend was acquired [the deal closed in the first quarter of fiscal 1997] it was viewed pretty positively," Butler said. Then Praegitzer's stock suffered a bit as problems integrating Trend surfaced, he added.
"Praegitzer had to significantly ramp up compensation schedules that lined the pockets of people at Trend," Butler continued.
Because Trend makes small-batch prototypes, it doesn't have a big sales pipeline to keep it busy, so Praegitzer was justifiably leery of disrupting Trend's sales force, Butler explained.
Once again, however, Praegitzer failed to do a great job of getting its message to Wall Street, Butler said.
The capital investments, Butler said, were needed even though they've had an impact on Praegitzer's bottom-line. Praegitzer also spent some time improving its manufacturing process, which is quite similar to the cleanroom environment at semiconductor plants.
The printed circuit board industry is in a period of consolidation and the winners will be the large companies that grab market share. Big companies will enjoy tremendous economies of scale and, viewed from a market share perspective, Praegitzer is definitely on the right track, Butler said. The company is taking market share from Merix Corp., which is based in Forest Grove, and Hadco of New Hampshire.
Praegitzer also is doing a good job of balancing growth with customer satisfaction, Butler said. The company's clients like Praegitzer, and that bodes well for the future, even if Wall Street doesn't typically reward companies for good customer service marks, Butler said.
"There is a window of opportunity right now," Butler said. "I would rather see them take risks with shareholder capital to grow with."
Praegitzer also recently announced plans to purchase a manufacturing facility in Malaysia. Bergeron said the deal should not have an adverse impact on second-quarter earnings, but Butler said the announcement is causing some concern. Given Praegitzer's underwhelming performance lately, Wall Street may be wondering if the company can simultaneously absorb another acquisition and grow its bottom line.
In fairness to Praegitzer, it should be noted that none of its peers has performed with much zest in recent quarters, said analyst Duley. Not only did Praegitzer embark on a course that required a lot of spending, it did so at a time when its industry was in the doldrums, he explained.
Though willing to be patient with Praegitzer, Duley said he is expecting better things.
"It seems an amount of time has gone by that is reasonable," he commented. "Going forward we should see some improvement."
Butler also expects to see some improvement, but noted that things-will-be-better-next-quarter has been something of a quarterly chorus from Praegitzer.
The easiest way to maintain good relations with the financial community is to deliver the expected earnings. And that is exactly what Praegitzer is ready to do, Bergeron said.
In the next quarter, Duley expects earnings of 21 cents per share on revenue of $47.4 million. The big jump in per share earnings should come from improved gross margins, he said.
Butler expects the company to earn 15 cents on $46.25 million in revenues. "That would represent a sequential improvement," he added. "It would show they are back on track."
And no surprises for The Street would be nice, too. |