Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j g cordes who wrote (16164)	1/22/1998 12:36:00 AM
From: Grainne	Respond to of 108807

Of course you may borrow my "no traction" comment, Jim. Help yourself. I pretty much answered the questions you raised about the president's relationships with women in the post to Mephisto. I guess I would add that many women have now been interviewed or deposed in the Paula Jones case who are indicating (according to Newsweek) that they were punished if they did not submit to his advances by either not getting a job controlled, or not being promoted. This would include a young woman in the White House who was a part-time employee, and wanted a full-time job. She went to him to talk to him in the Oval Office, and ended up fighting off his sexual advances in a little hideaway he has next to his office. These obviously are sexual harassment cases under workplace law. So it really goes far beyond President Clinton's private sex life. I don't exactly find abusive relationships interesting. In the past I've been attracted to men who I knew wouldn't be good for me, but I resisted them, as I would hope more women would resist Billy!!!!!