Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Taking Advantage of a Sharply Changing Environment -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (2158)	8/5/2019 6:40:03 PM
From: Doug R	1 Recommendation Recommended By Hawkmoon Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6365

Oh, the total solar irradiance thing. It's kind of a moot point since the cooling of the planet is accomplished through increased cosmic ray-induced cloud nucleation...not so much by any reduction in TSI. If what is being radiated is reflected back into space by more clouds, it could be within any range of TSI and the result will be very nearly the same as far as surface temp. on Earth. Some amending of the paper wouldn't hurt. But in the end, it's about cosmic ray flux at Earth. And that the Sun isn't the only thing out there that can affect cosmic ray flux at Earth. The NASA forecast for a weaker cycle 25 (which matches Zharkova's forecast for the same) says the cosmic ray beatings will continue until the Sun's morale has improved. And even then, the weaker magnetosphere failing to shield the planet is adding injury to insult. Or you could take it that the GSM is adding insult to the magnetic polar excursion which is the real 800lb gorilla in the room. The solar geeks don't get that part yet.