Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (149900)	8/8/2019 1:55:14 AM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Recommended By abuelita Respond to of 217544

Re <<dim sum>> Am relaxing here in the living space of the B&B as my brood together w/ my brother and sister-in-law went to lunch. I only had breakfast at 11:30 - am talking relaxed to point of near-comatose. Shall start work in the coming week, doing what I do not know, but to tie up loose ends for sure. There is no hurry to quickly invent new sources of stress. W/ each incremental increase of gold pricing by way of macro this and overarching that, stress lessens Turns out gold is not just another commodity, money, faith, politic view, ... but also a anti-stress meditation The Suzhou decompression is good, and engaging w/ person on main canal always useful for waypoint calibration. None are waiting for rate rise.

To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (149900)	8/11/2019 11:56:46 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217544

received news from Canada On 11 Aug 2019, at 11:41 PM, P wrote: In british columbia we now have another perverse situation developed house owners over 65 an elect to defer their taxes against a modest penalty. My uncle tells me 1% per annum. So his friends electing not to pay the tax , defer against the property value, and instead deposit money in bank for higher interest rate than the deferment penalty. Canada banks still positive rates against long term deposits I can only assume that this was to reduce burden on older age voters. Who have equity in homes but limited incomes