SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (150153)8/20/2019 5:28:34 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218493
 
am wondering if team Japan thought through the possibility that is but an eventuality

seems the team should have checked the import and export ledger, first, before making a move the team might have to eat for lunch, dinner, and then, the leftover, for breakfast

bloomberg.com

Trade Feud With South Korea Threatens Heating Fuel Shortage in Japan

Heesu Lee19 August 2019, 12:41 GMT+8
Photographer: Takaaki Iwabu/Bloomberg

economics

By and
Tsuyoshi Inajima
19 August 2019, 05:00 GMT+8

Some 79% of Japan kerosene imports came from Korea last year

A Seoul export ban may cause acute tightness: Fitch Solutions



LISTEN TO ARTICLE
Terms of Trade is a daily newsletter that untangles a world embroiled in trade wars. Sign up here.

Japanese consumers may face a costlier bill to stay warm this winter if South Korea bans exports of heating fuel to its neighbor as the trade feud between the two countries deepens.

Kerosene is used as a fuel in portable stoves and fan heaters, particularly in the colder northern part of Japan. While local production accounts for about 90% of consumption, most imports come from Korea. An export ban by Seoul -- especially if accompanied by refinery outages or a severe winter -- could cause shortages and price spikes, according to six traders.

The North Asian neighbors have been at loggerheads since late last year over proper compensation for Koreans forced to work in Japanese-run factories, mines and brothels during World War II. The dispute has escalated in recent weeks with Tokyo and Seoul removing each other from preferred trading lists and Korean consumers boycotting Japanese products.

Heavy Reliance
South Korea accounted for 79% of Japan's kerosene imports in 2018
Source: Ministry of Finance

“The likely outcome of any potential ban of kerosene exports from South Korea to Japan will be a period of acute supply tightness,” said Peter Lee, an analyst at Fitch Solutions in Singapore. The impact will be magnified if it happens in winter when Japan becomes more reliant on term cargoes from Korea, he said.

Some 79% of Japan’s kerosene imports came from South Korea last year, with those shipments accounting for 13% of total requirements, according to government data. Japanese refiners typically start stockpiling fuel from Korea as early as August to prepare for winter.

Japan would likely turn to China and Singapore for kerosene and gasoline imports in the event of a Korean ban, said Sushant Gupta, director of Asia-Pacific refining at Wood Mackenzie Ltd. in Singapore. While replacement supplies are available, expensive freight costs and a lack of receiving capacity at ports make transporting the fuel difficult, said several of the traders, who didn’t want to be named due to company policy.

Domestic kerosene prices were 90.9 yen ($0.85) per liter on Aug. 13, compared with an average of 92.6 yen over the past year, according to data from Japan’s Oil Information Center.

JXTG Holdings Inc., Japan’s biggest refiner, said it wasn’t too concerned about the rise in Japan-Korea tensions. “There’s no particular impact on our energy business for the time being, but we need to pay close attention to developments,” said Yoshiaki Ouchi, JXTG’s senior vice president.

However, Idemitsu Kosan Co. said it has to think about how to prepare if the political situation worsens. The refiner has several options including producing more kerosene locally, importing more from nations apart from Korea or building up bigger inventories than usual before winter, said executive officer Noriaki Sakai.

(Adds Japanese kerosene price in seventh paragraph.)




To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (150153)8/21/2019 11:41:42 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218493
 
news flow from the Vietnam front ...

my guess is enough companies trying Vietnam and points south and west shall be hiccupped to the point of extinction unless they calibrate their migration in a way that it becomes almost meaningless

essentially the team USA companies force-marched by trade war shall experience higher cost, lower international market share, and ultimately crippled USA market presence - a guess

let's watch

wsj.com

Manufacturers Want to Quit China for Vietnam. They’re Finding It Impossible.

Global companies are rushing to seek alternative bases, only to find even promising countries like Vietnam don’t match up

By Niharika Mandhana | Photographs by Linh Pham for The Wall Street Journal

Aug. 21, 2019 10:33 am ET
HO CHI MINH CITY, Vietnam—With the U.S. and China tangled in a nasty trade fight, this should be Vietnam’s time to shine. Instead, it is becoming increasingly clear that it will be years, if ever, before this Southeast Asian nation and other aspiring manufacturing destinations are ready to replace China as the world’s factory floor.

The specialized supply chains that made China a production powerhouse for smartphones and aluminum ladders and vacuum cleaners and dining tables are nowhere near as developed in Vietnam. Factories with U.S.-focused safety certifications and capital-intensive machinery aren’t as easy to find.

And Vietnam, with less than one-tenth China’s population, is already running into labor shortages as global manufacturers rush to set up shop here to avoid U.S. tariffs.

“China has a 15-year head start—whatever you want, someone’s doing it,” said Wing Xu, the operations director for Omnidex Group, which helps make large pumps for Pennsylvania-based industrial equipment manufacturer McLanahan Corp.


Workers make cast-iron parts at the Duc Kim Tinh factory in Binh Duong Province.
Omnidex has shifted some production to Vietnam, but out of more than 80 parts of a pump used in mining operations, factories here have been able to begin work on only 20 so far because molds must be created from scratch.

“You can’t just shift your business to Vietnam and expect to find what you’re looking for,” she said.

Business leaders say they are preparing for a protracted fight between the world’s two largest economies. Few companies are planning to leave China altogether, but those that heavily clustered production in the country are urgently looking to diversify.

Some companies are relocating parts of their production lines to Southeast Asian countries or elsewhere, while continuing to manufacture in China for the Chinese and non-U.S. markets, a strategy they call “China+1.” Others with huge orders are hoping to nudge their Chinese suppliers to move operations out of China.

As a result, a new global manufacturing landscape is starting to take shape, executives say. Production leaving China is getting divvied up among developing countries, with a small portion going to the U.S. on the back of automation. The reordering of supply chains is likely to leave China with a diminished but still significant share of the pie.

The creation of new industrial clusters won’t happen overnight. Vietnam offers cheap labor, but its 100-million population is small compared with China’s 1.3 billion, and its roads and ports are already clogged. India has the manpower, but skill levels fall short and government rules are relatively restrictive.

“The question everyone is asking is: ‘Where should we go?’ ” said Giang Le, a Singapore-based analyst for strategic consulting firm Control Risks. “The answer is not obvious.”

California-based camera-maker GoPro Inc. is moving most of its U.S.-bound production to Guadalajara in Mexicowhile keeping its China operations for other markets. Universal ElectronicsInc., which is based in Arizona and makes smart-home technology, has a new partner in the Philippines and is also expanding operations in Monterrey, Mexico.

Hong Kong-listed Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd., which makes Hoover vacuum cleaners, will set up a new plant in Vietnam and add capacity to its Mississippi operations. It will maintain some production in China for at least a decade, the company said.

The Chinese model of the past 20 years thrived on suppliers being close to each other, making production quicker, less expensive and more efficient. Now, as operations become more fragmented, they are threatening to raise costs, stretch delivery times and expose companies to multiple tax and labor regimes.

Companies are starting to focus on the intricate rules that govern how much of a product needs to be manufactured in a country, say Vietnam, to be considered “Made in Vietnam,” said Willy C. Shih, an economist specializing in manufacturing at Harvard Business School. “The era of the benign trading environment is over,” he said.

The shake-up is just the opportunity Vietnam has been waiting for. Labor-intensive manufacturing of sneakers and sweaters moved here years ago in response to rising Chinese wages. South Korean giant Samsung Electronics Co. has invested billions. Hanoi is eager to further expand electronics and engineering industries that are high up the value chain.

Industrial parks have been flooded with inquiries. BW Industrial Development, backed by U.S. private-equity firm Warburg Pincus, began building factories-for-rent last year. Its facilities are booked through December. Marketing head Michael Chan said some tenants are rushing from site visits to signing contracts in just a week.

Vietnamese firm Hanel PT, which makes electronics for fire alarms and motion sensors, says it is negotiating its biggest deal yet, equal in value to half its current contracts. The 20-year-old manufacturer counts big Japanese companies as clients, said director Tran Thu Trang, but U.S. firms have made contact for the first time.

time.


A factory developed by BW Industrial Development JSC in Binh Duong Province has been rented by a Japanese woodworking company which plans to move production here in September.
Ho Chi Minh City-based Seditex Co. Ltd., which connects foreign firms to local factories, began receiving 20 requests a week after tariffs were increased last September, up from 20 a month. Foreign companies wanted to know about making a range of products, including backpacks, pliers, Bluetooth speakers, boat covers, suitcase wheels and clothes racks.

Founder Frank Vossen said companies accustomed to operating in China are struggling to adapt. “There is no ready-made solution in Vietnam, that’s the reality check,” he said.

Workers are already getting tough to find. A local exporter of pipes and hoses is swamped with orders for tariff-hit products, but it has only been able to hire 30 of the 100 workers it needs. A Japanese furniture maker for brand Muji said it has had production delays since January because of labor shortages.

Yotaro Kanamori, the planning manager for the Tokyo-based firm Generation Pass Co. Ltd., said the firm is now renting a factory for itself instead of relying on contract work. He struggles to explain to his Vietnamese suppliers why a table’s underside needs to be as well-made as the top.

The manufacturing shift toward Vietnam has been a long time in the making. Early movers such as Nike Inc. began buying shoes from Vietnamese factories in the mid-1990s. As minimum wages in China grew, more orders for clothes, toys and shoes shifted to less expensive destinations in Bangladesh, Myanmar and Vietnam.

Japanese multinational Canon Inc. began making printers in northern Vietnam in 2012. But supply chains for products like printers and cameras are vast and difficult to re-create. Of Canon’s network of 175 suppliers in Vietnam, only 20 are local companies, said senior manager Dao Thi Thu Huyen. They mostly make plastic parts and packaging.

Nearly all the electronics components come from Japan, China and Taiwan, she said.


Engineers from Monidex Manufacturing Vietnam supervise the production of their order at Duc Kim Tinh factory.
The pace of companies moving production lines to Vietnam began speeding up last year as executives who had been weighing the country’s potential decided to take the plunge.

Christopher Devereux had started a company called ChinaSavvy in the early 2000s that took orders from Western firms for complex metal products and worked with factories in China to get them made at what he used to tout as “China prices.” By late 2018, after the U.S. imposed tariffs, his clients began asking: How quickly can you move out of China?

Mr. Devereux inspected dozens of factories in Vietnam, sometimes six a day, and rebranded his company “Omnidex” to project a global profile.

Relocating the manufacturing of pumps for Pennsylvania’s McLanahan Corp. is taking some doing. The pumps are made up of seven dozen pieces that must be cast precisely to avoid leaks. Mr. Devereux first tested the waters by making the small parts in factories near Ho Chi Minh City. Even that wasn’t easy, said Truong Khac Long, the Vietnam manager.


Truong Khac Long, general director of Omnidex Manufacturing Vietnam.
The bright red DuPont powder coating was tough to get. There weren’t as many qualified foundries to choose from, and those producing for the domestic market didn’t always have quality-control specialists. Engineers from China had to travel back and forth to Vietnam, where suppliers made samples again and again to get it exactly right.

Executives decided the manufacturing of bigger parts couldn’t be moved. The pump would be produced in two countries, unable to fully escape tariffs.

By spring 2019, Peter Zhao, who was in charge of getting products made for Wisconsin-based electrical tools company ECM Industries, had given up hope the trade war would end. He turned to Google to search for agents in Southeast Asia and contacted Vietnam-based intermediary Seditex.

Mr. Zhao directed them to find a factory with experience making multimeters, which measure voltage and are currently made in China. Seditex agents scoured their networks but couldn’t come up with one. The closest fit was a firm called Viettronics that made TVs and other devices.

In their office, a Viettronics R&D expert dismantled the sample multimeter Mr. Zhao had sent. His conclusion: The company could find local suppliers for the instrument’s plastic casing and cables and assemble the multimeter in its factory, but some of the major parts, like the integrated circuit, would need to be imported.

That was a problem for Mr. Zhao. He was used to buying nearly everything in China since production of the multimeter moved there a decade ago from Taiwan. Over time, Chinese factories created their own tweaked model that drew on the strengths of their well-developed supply networks.


Aerial view of a factory complex in Binh Duong Province.
Mr. Zhao didn’t get involved with solving design questions or finding components, concerning himself only with the finished product and final price. He interacted largely with the main supplier, not the tiers of vendors underneath, and maintained a lean operation.

To move production to Vietnam, he said he would have to develop a cross-border supply chain from scratch, identify factories in China for parts the Vietnamese can’t make and negotiate quality standards, compatibility and prices. He didn’t have the manpower or budget for that, he said.

Still, he is thinking about brokering a partnership so that major Chinese parts can be encased in Vietnam-made plastic covers and assembled in a Vietnamese factory. He worries though that if something goes wrong, his Chinese and Vietnamese vendors will each blame the other.

“It’s risky,” he said. “It may not work, and the costs may be too high.”

—Le Giang Lam in Hanoi and Eli Binder in Singapore contributed to this article.

Write to Niharika Mandhana at niharika.mandhana@wsj.com



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (150153)8/23/2019 4:44:43 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218493
 
team Huawei, the David, seems to be strategically composed

reuters.com




To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (150153)8/23/2019 8:48:18 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218493
 
am very extremely amused by the developments on the Huawei front of the trade war, because I cannot help but recall some know-it-all-for-sure messiah character mouthing off on the vulnerabilities of huawei simply because he climbed some poles

I had materially helped Ericsson to establish its first 7 JVs in China and helped it to defeat Nokia on the last GSM base station JV license available, all circa 1991 -1997, but I never ever claimed to know the space in this age of internet of everything.

Old knowledge is has-been knowledge, outdated, and no longer good, particularly if baked under tropical sun and pickled in sorry-juice, a fate I hope to avoid.

But I do believe am mathematically oriented, and when situations are reckoned mathematically, perhaps better reckoning result, just maybe

in any case, below Japanese-take by usual suspect with much error rate still gives some more weight to the mathematical look of 5G rollout, and good luck to those huaweiless

japantimes.co.jp

China holds the key to 5G technology's growth

Waichi SekiguchiAug 23, 2019

Ken Hu, deputy chairman of Huawei Technologies Co., gives a keynote speech at the Mobile World Congress Shanghai 2019, Asia's largest mobile technology exhibition, in late June. | WAICHI SEKIGUCHIThe most closely watched technology in the information and communications field today is the next-generation superfast mobile network. The communication speed of the fifth-generation (5G) network will be roughly 100 times faster than the current standard and, due to its ultralow risk of delays and the massive capacity for simultaneous connections, the technology will hopefully be used in a wide variety of services ranging from the delivery of high-resolution video to self driving vehicles and remote machine operation.

Service on the 5G network was launched in April in South Korea and the United States. Last month in Japan, the Internal Affairs and Communications Ministry distributed licenses for 5G services. Commercial service is set to begin next spring as the nation prepares to host the 2020 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games in Tokyo.

The technology has also been the centerpiece of sanctions imposed by the U.S. government on Chinese firms in the intensifying row between the world’s two largest economies. In mid-August, the U.S. introduced a ban on the federal government from procuring products from five Chinese high-tech firms, including Huawei Technologies Co. and ZTE Corp., based on the National Defense Authorization Act that became law a year ago. It is also moving to prohibit U.S. electronics parts makers and software firms from selling their products to Huawei.

The U.S. government charges that Huawei has built “back doors” into its products for stealing user information, and that therefore it cannot adopt its products for the U.S. communications system on national security grounds. It has urged Canada, Japan and European countries to take similar steps. Japan, which is just about to introduce its 5G network, looks set to follow the U.S. in its measures against Huawei.

Views are emerging, however, that to expedite the building of the 5G network, it is not desirable to exclude the Chinese firms. During a conference organized by the U.S. government in late July related to the National Defense Authorization Act, an estimate showed that the price of communication devices in the U.S. could rise by more than 10 percent if Chinese suppliers are excluded from the U.S. market because the free market will be hampered.

Signs of the superiority of Chinese companies were also observed in late June at the Mobile World Congress Shanghai 2019, Asia’s largest mobile technology exhibition. The exhibition took place after 5G licenses were distributed by the Chinese government, and the event featured various demonstrations using the technology, such as remote medical services and remote operation of construction machinery.

In a keynote speech, Huawei Deputy Chairman Ken Hu stressed that China is the most advanced in the 5G field. Huawei has already concluded more than 50 5G-related contracts with communications service companies around the world, and has installed more than 150,000 base stations — a number that is expected to reach 500,000 by the year’s end. As sales of 5G telecom equipment increase, prices will decrease, thereby solidifying the Chinese firms’ global lead in the 5G field.

Other communications device manufacturers such as Ericsson of Sweden and Finland’s Nokia offer 5G products, but so far Huawei is the only supplier in the world that develops and delivers a full product lineup from mobile terminals to base stations. Therefore, emerging economies and developing countries that lack their own 5G technology believe that the development of their domestic 5G infrastructure will proceed more rapidly if everything is left in the hands of Huawei.

For that reason, many countries, including Malaysia, Indonesia and Brazil, are moving forward with adopting Huawei products for their 5G networks.

For its part, Huawei is taking steps that appear intended to encourage such decisions, for example by announcing a $800 million investment in Brazil’s state of Sao Paulo to build a new plant to make 5G base station products.

In fact, the U.S. market accounts for a tiny portion of Huawei’s worldwide sales. U.S. sales combined with those in Canada and Latin American countries comprise a mere 6.5 percent of Huawei’s global sales. It makes more than half of its sales in China, and countries in the rest of Asia, the Middle East and Africa are its key overseas customers. It has not made many inroads into the base station market in the U.S. due to U.S. government intentions, and Huawei says it does not expect the latest U.S. sanctions to cause major damage to its business. Rather, the sanctions are prompting Huawei to focus even more on emerging markets.

Of course, it’s not that the U.S. sanctions will have no impact on Huawei. Aside from the base station business, Huawei sells smartphones using Google’s Android mobile operating system in the global market. The U.S. government has urged U.S. companies that make key smartphone components and develop apps to not supply their products to Huawei. Huawei would suffer huge damage if its access to popular U.S.-made apps is blocked. Huawei has disclosed that its global smartphone shipments in the April-June period fell 10 million units short of the initial estimate of 70 million.

Huawei, however, is taking a series of quick steps to secure key smartphone components and software. It has already developed a next-generation flagship processor named Kirin 985 and has built its own Android-compatible software for the smartphone operating system. It has also released a smartphone for the 5G service.

While it plans to keep using the Android OS on its products for overseas markets, it’s preparing to build a system that will shield it from disruptions to product shipments to the domestic market and emerging economies in case its supply of Android operating systems is terminated. It also plans to turn its own smartphone OS into open-source software to foster collaboration with other rising telecom equipment makers.

Currently, the world market for mobile operating systems is dominated by Android and Apple Inc.’s iOS. But if Huawei is to start going its own way, there is no guarantee that the structure of the global smartphone market dominated by the U.S. firms will remain unchanged.

Many apps have been developed for Android and iOS because there are so many mobile terminals using those operating systems. It will only be a matter of time before apps that run on a new operating system will be developed if the mobile devices using the new OS gain a large share of the market. In that case, the sanctions intended to cap Huawei’s rise might end up working to its advantage.

In its trade row with China, the U.S. government said the imposition of its fourth round of punitive tariffs on Chinese imports would be postponed until mid-December — to avert negatively impacting domestic sales in the Christmas shopping season. U.S. consumers depend on Chinese imports for 90 percent of the targeted products — laptop computers, game equipment, toys and so on.

In that sense, Washington may be thinking that the country can do with domestic procurement of telecom equipment. Since the U.S. lacks a major manufacturer of mobile communications equipment, however, it will be difficult to procure the 5G mobile system. The U.S. will be able to buy equipment from European firms like Ericsson and Nokia, but a lack of sufficient competition may inflate their cost. In the end, that cost will be passed on to U.S. consumers.

The U.S. government will likely not budge on what it considers to be national security concerns. But to build the 5G network infrastructure in the U.S. smoothly and at a low cost, the U.S. and China should discuss their high-tech friction and seek out a solution. The same thing can also be said of the Japanese government, which one-sidedly follows the U.S. on this issue.

Waichi Sekiguchi is president of MMRI, a Japanese research and consulting firm on information technology. He was formerly an editorial writer and a Washington correspondent for the Nikkei newspaper.



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (150153)8/23/2019 10:42:53 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218493
 
the history-doesn't-matter / mathematically-challenged cretins, morons, dullards, and same such, especially those whose cerebral functions have been pickled in sorry-juice and baked under troppo-sun, cannot fathom that the net net net of the Hong Kong demonstrations is a glorious effort to uphold high private property prices as home ownership rate in freedom Hong Kong is ~50% and w/ high equity participation (as opposed to the rubbish visually-high stats from other lands but w/ only ~5% equity skin in the game) - HK loan to value starts at 60%, generally lower, and many have no loans outstanding

am hyper bullish on HK but perhaps best if the financial and real estate markets can be de-risked. So far all moves are tepid, as if the streets are cool.

2M folks demonstrated, then 1.7M did, and come October 1st hopefully 5M do, to uphold value and maintain worth

in the mean time, all sides got messages best heeded, and mostly exemplary

the perps on all sides, including w/I the ranks of the police, shall go to jail, being exemplary

social interaction is good, and occasional intensive interaction is rejuvenating, good for the soul

but yes, the sorry lot in troppo sun, pickled in sorry-juice, and and and, would always kibitz this and that, thinking nothing and knowing less, except about olives and pizzas, which they get wrong anyways



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (150153)8/25/2019 9:02:19 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218493
 
Super ultra overarching macro should raise option premium, which should be embraced

wsj.com

Trump Gambles That China Trade War Will Pay Off in 2020

Shaken markets and fears of wider slowdown test whether president’s posture will benefit him

By
Josh Zumbrun and
Alex Leary

Updated Aug. 25, 2019 8:46 am ET

0:00 / 2:26





Support for Free Trade Grows Despite Trump Criticisms, Poll Shows

As ?President Trump's campaign to revamp free?-trade deals negotiated in the past? has intensified, a growing number of Americans ?polled ?say they support free trade.Democratic presidential hopefuls including front-runner Joe Biden already see vulnerabilities for Mr. Trump in the effects at home, including businesses and consumers hit by tariffs and farmers who can’t sell their crops to China because of Beijing’s retaliatory measures.

“It’s crushing the American farmer,” the former vice president said Tuesday in Warren County, Iowa. “How many farmers across this state, across this nation, have to face the prospect of losing everything, losing their farm because of these tariffs?”

Fair TradeGallup asked: "Please tell me if you believeeach has a fair trade policy or an unfair tradepolicy with the United States."

%FairUnfairCanadaEUJapanMexicoChina020406080

U.S. consumers are expected to start feeling the effect after Sept. 1, when apparel, electronics and other items will be subject to 10% tariffs, followed by levies on smartphones, toys and other products on Dec. 15.

China responded Friday by announcing new tariffs on $75 billion worth of U.S. products, prompting Mr. Trump to threaten further escalation and sending financial markets into another nose-dive.

At the Group of Seven summit in Biarritz, France, on Sunday, Mr. Trump appeared to show a glimmer of regret about escalating trade tensions with China. However, some hours later, White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham doubled down on the president’s commitment to the trade war, saying Mr. Trump “regrets not raising the tariffs higher.”

Mr. Trump has so far remained unfazed. While there are risks to his strategy, some political analysts and pollsters contend his get-tough-on-China platform can help anchor the president’s campaign, just as it did in 2016.

“2020 is going to be framed by this issue,” said Steve Bannon, Mr. Trump’s former chief strategist. “It’s beyond a trade war. It’s engaging them in this economic conflict, which is trade, technology and currency. He’s got to be out there every day pounding it.”

Mr. Trump, however, could be vulnerable if pressing the trade war against China yields no obvious results. Employment growth in manufacturing has slowed over the past year. Measures of industrial production are also slumping, indicating a manufacturing economy under pressure.

What is more, the impact of tariffs on consumers is just beginning to be felt. JPMorgan Chase & Co. estimates the average U.S. household will have to pay $1,000 a year in added costs once all scheduled levies are implemented.

0:00 / 2:36





Amid Signs of a Recession, Government Is Running Out of Tools

The government typically uses three tools to help ward off a recession. But with these already in play to help prop up the economy, the Trump administration may have reason to worry. WSJ's Gerald F. Seib explains. Photo: AP
Mo Elleithee, executive director of the Georgetown Institute of Politics and Public Service and a former top Democratic National Committee official, believes Mr. Trump’s aggressive posture with China could backfire as consumers start paying higher prices.

“While it may help the president with some people who like the bravado of it, the economic bottom line for a lot of people is very shaky,” Ms. Elleithee said. “You’ve got some supporters of the president saying this pain is your patriotic duty, but I’m not sure that is something a lot of people are going to buy into a few months down the road.”

Democrats overall have been divided on trade, with top-echelon candidates like Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren holding similar views as Mr. Trump. One of Mr. Trump’s fiercest critics, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York, has repeatedly urged him to carry on the fight with China.

At rallies and in his comments to reporters, Mr. Trump has portrayed himself as taking on a job others didn’t have the stomach to pursue.

Do you think free trade with foreigncountries is good or bad for America?

GoodBadOverallSupportedTrump in2016 primary“This isn’t my trade war,” he told reporters on Wednesday, angrily dismissing a question about the risk of a recession. “This is a trade war that should have taken place a long time ago by a lot of other presidents.”

Looking into the sky, spreading his hands, he added: “I am the chosen one. Somebody had to do it. So I’m taking on China.”

Within the administration, advisers who early on warned against a conflict have mostly left, giving more sway to hawks who have urged him to press forward.

And while Americans in general support free trade, people believe China has unfair trade practices with the U.S. by a 62% to 30% margin, according to a Gallup poll last year.

“China is a unique case,” said Mohamed Younis, Gallup’s editor in chief. “It’s the only country where a majority of Americans agree that they have an unfair trade relationship with the United States.”

Share Your ThoughtsHas the trade war changed your mind about President Trump? How? Join the conversation below.

Mr. Trump won the presidency in 2016 in large part by narrowly flipping industrial states Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and GOP strategists say his message resonated with factory workers and others who believed China’s rise came at the expense of manufacturing jobs in the U.S.

But the economy’s job gains under Mr. Trump have been concentrated in professional services and health care, industries far removed from the trade war.

The brunt of the conflict has been felt by farmers, who tend to be in deeply Republican regions and so far back the president’s initiative. Their economic pain has been mitigated by billions of dollars in government aid to make up for the loss of sales to China.

The patience voters may afford Mr. Trump now could change if the overall economy begins to sour, and if voters blame the trade war for a downturn.

In recent days, as worries of a global recession have risen, the president has blasted the Federal Reserve and its chairman, Jerome Powell, just as White House officials have fanned out to TV news shows to argue the economy is strong and not threatened by the trade war.

“They know that’s where they are exposed and are starting a campaign against it,” said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, former chief economist for the White House Council of Economic Advisers under President George W. Bush. “They are pushing very hard to stop that narrative.”

Chris Krueger, a managing director at Cowen Washington Research Group, said Democrats would rather talk about topics such as climate change and income inequality than trade. Because they generally agree with Mr. Trump’s posture toward China, he said, they are left with arguing the more nuanced point that he is going about it the wrong way.

“It’s sort of a muddled message right now,” Mr. Krueger said.

Despite their public bravado, members of Mr. Trump’s team are preparing for a slowing economy by framing the trade war as a fight for American jobs and workers. One senior Trump adviser played down the impact of market turmoil on rank-and file voters, characterizing that as an issue that largely concerns the affluent.

“Democrats want to fight for the stock market and fat cats on Wall Street? Go right ahead,” the adviser said.

Even amid slowing manufacturing, the Trump campaign thinks the president could expand the electoral map to several other states with traditional manufacturing bases like Minnesota, New Hampshire and Maine.

Mr. Bannon is among those contending the conflict will run through the campaign season.

“Trump’s not folding and this is not going to be resolved by Election Day in 2020,” he said. “This is the single most defining issue in the first half of the 21st century and it will set the tone and the direction of not just the country but the global economy. That’s why this is a fight worth having.”

—Ken Thomas contributed to this article.

Write to Josh Zumbrun at Josh.Zumbrun@wsj.com and Alex Leary at alex.leary@wsj.com



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (150153)8/25/2019 7:53:09 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218493
 
I believe quite unprecedented, an employee-owned company taking on the White House

the kibitzers still believe team Huawei cares one iota re where / when the trade war ends; must be due to pickling of cerebral faculty under troppo sun.

I am guessing huawei is good enough for its assurance that come November 2020 the team would be effectively free of all team usa tech, irrespective of who occupies the white house, and in the meantime should anything outrageous be done to egregiously sabotage the team behind what has already been done, the sovereign shall rare earth hypersonic the culprits

in the meantime who can know, as wars are unpredictable

let's see how Canada would like to be detailed based on Meng kidnap decision that should be soon enough
forbes.com

Huawei Warns Trump: 'If You Want To Stop Us, You Need To Try Harder'
Zak Doffman



AFP/Getty Images
The impact of the U.S. blacklisting is less than feared, and Huawei is fully prepared to deal with the restrictions for a long time to come. That was the message given to reporters at an event at the company's HQ in Shenzhen on Friday [August 23]. Although, of course, the real audience was not the assembled media but the Trump administration—thousands of miles away in Washington—as the battle of wills continues.

The statements were made at a launch event for the company's new Ascend 910 AI chip—intended to rival the likes of Qualcomm and Nvidia. "The Ascend 910 has more computing power than any other AI processor in the world," the company said in a statement. And the backdrop is, of course, Huawei's ongoing program to break its reliance on U.S. tech that is restricted under its blacklisting.

A further 90-day reprieve was formalised by the Commerce Department this week, but all signs (currently) point to a full lockdown in November, and an additional 46 Huawei "affiliates" have been added to the entity list this week, making the existing restrictions harder to deal with. The extension provides Huawei with three further months of (some level of) supply chain surety—time enough to launch its next smartphones and to continue development of its "Plan B."

"We’re giving [customers] a little more time to wean themselves off [Huawei]," Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross explained. "But no specific licenses are being granted for anything." Adding later that "as we continue to urge consumers to transition away from Huawei’s products, we recognize that more time is necessary to prevent any disruption."

Just ahead of the reprieve being announced, U.S. President Donald Trump had a blunt message for the Chinese giant—"we are not open to doing business with [Huawei]," the president said, "I don’t want to do business at all because it is a national security threat."

And Huawei's riposte at the launch event for the AI chip was equally blunt. "The 90-day reprieve has no value to Huawei," company chairman Eric Xu told the media. "We are already used to living and working under the Entity List—we are ready to work and live under such a situation for a long time."

And if that wasn't frank enough, asked about the impact those restrictions are likely to have on business performance this year, Xu was just as blunt.



The impact, Xu told reporters, would not reach the levels feared, the $30 billion or so that company CEO Ren Zhengfei had reported could be wiped from the top line. "But you have to wait till our results in March," Xu added when pressed.

The Ascend 910 was pre-announced late last year, and Huawei claims it offers market-leading performance in quickly crunching through masses of cloud data. And that's what everyone wants right now. "Ascend 910 performs much better than we expected," Xu claimed. "Without a doubt, it has more computing power than any other AI processor in the world—we have been making steady progress since we announced our AI strategy in October last year."

Huawai has said that it "will continue investing in AI processors to deliver more abundant, affordable, and adaptable computing power that meets the needs of a broad range of scenarios," citing autonomous vehicles as an example.

"Everything is moving forward according to plan," Xu said, "from R&D to product launch. We promised a full-stack, all-scenario AI portfolio. And today we delivered."

Huawei is balancing maintenance of corporate and consumer confidence, hedging its bets on where the U.S. blacklist actually ends up once trade talks conclude, the reality of a wholesale replacement of U.S. tech—notwithstanding that it may have little choice, and the media scrutiny currently applied to every statement.

Take the chip release event and bullish statements, the HarmonyOS launch and the Google Maps rival reports as part of the same PR program—the message is clear, but as ever the truth behind the scenes is harder to discern.

Time will tell.