Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hunter Vann who wrote (2300)	1/22/1998 11:55:00 AM
From: Deep Digm	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4736

I've kept out of this until now but I've got to tell you, you are good at this, The term "Professional agitator" comes to mind. Also "Prince of Darkness". You really know how to walk the line and selectively use parts of someones posts to make your "argument". Your mistake is that when making your point it's usually a stretch, as you just did when describing Marty's post, and I quote; "Mr. Linskey sure doesn't have any patience with any naysayers regarding NAMX." IMO there was nothing in his post to indicate his emotions were motivating it but you're so determined to make him look bad that you consistantly cross the line of reason revealing the anger that's really behind your statements. Marty's statements about SOROS' phony news release IMO was justified. I know SOROS, we've talked in the past on the Zitel thread and I enjoyed the contact. I respected his opinions, learned from his comments, and came to trust them both. I read his phony post that day and without realizing it was "a joke", bought more stock. And I wasn't the only one, check out the volume and price changes for the day. The posts I read accepted his joke claiming that a responsible investor should never buy stock based on someone's post and if you did so you've only got yourself to blame. I don't share that opinion for 3 reasons; 1. SOROS wasn't just "anyone". Just reading most reactions to his return proves that. 2. IMO there was much too much "daylight" between the end of that phony post and the ultimate disclaimer. 3. Remembering that the result of the information we exchange, the friendships we make, the trust we bestow and ultimately the actions we take involve OUR MONEY. IMO "JOKES" like that have no place here UNLESS they're a lot easier to recognize. When it happened I just shook my head, shut my mouth, and kept my disappointment to myself. I say this now ONLY to let you know that Marty's point about that post is valid and reasonable and is shared by someone else, and not motivated by anger. If it was I would have blown up about it that day instead of keeping quiet. Your attempt to portray Marty's post as an angry reaction to unwanted questions is as much of a joke as you are. UP yours, Deep Digm