To: Thomas M. who wrote (43481 ) 8/27/2019 9:21:23 PM From: EL KABONG!!! Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 45639 Hmmm... What am I missing here? Assuming that there are no ties during the regular season, there will be (at the end of the season) a total of 256 wins by the 32 teams in aggregate, and 256 losses by the 32 teams in aggregate, which reflects the fact that there are 256 games played by the 32 teams in aggregate. When I total the wins presented here on the actionnetwork.com, I get a total of 258 games, or an overage of 2 winning games for the season. So that means that there is a bias that would (slightly) favor looking for unders rather than overs. If I were to pick some overs, say New England to win 13 games, Pittsburgh to win 12 games, Philadelphia to win 12 games and so on (pick whatever teams you want), the teams with overs wins in excess of what is presented here have to come (by definition) at the expense of other teams which would now be unders what their own projections are. Correct? I think so... So, if I were picking, I'd look for where the overs teams (say New England, Pittsburgh and Philadelphia) are going to acquire those excess wins (I'd need to look at the full schedule for all involved teams) and then match overs and unders according to the schedules, and wager accordingly. Now for my money, I see several potential unders, and more than just a few overs. Does anyone really see the Jets winning 7.5 games or the Giants winning 6 games? Can the Cardinals win 5 games or the Dolphins 4.5? In looking at all of the teams with a projection of 6.5 games or less, only Tampa Bay might be risky as an under from my perspective. I think I might be more likely to play the unders here. Just my opinion though. I don't have any skin in the game... EK!!!