Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ALANCO ENVIRONMENTAL: ALAN -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Schafe who wrote (270)	1/22/1998 6:50:00 PM
From: John Chapman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 402

I think the reason it is not moving is that there is just a lot of shares out there. We have to get rid of the old hands first and gradually move up from there. The process is taking longer than I hoped for.

To: Schafe who wrote (270)	1/25/1998 10:21:00 AM
From: Paul Bartosh	Respond to of 402

No one came from miles around. Yet another volume fizzle after some good news. Make no mistake, the press release for last quarter's numbers was good news. But I'm with you, I'm very disappointed in the top line growth of only $7000. Fry Guy HAD to have a nice quarter...there's no way around it. We had to have much lower numbers from the other parts of the consolidated operation. Everybody's talking about CDSI, but let's not forget AEMI (Alanco Environmental Manufacturing Inc.). According to the last 10-K, "manufacturing" contributed to $3.7 million of Alanco's $7 million in last fiscal year's revenues. AND (as stated in the 10-K), some of that revenue is in the agriculture industry which is season (drops off in Oct/Nov and picks up again in April/May). Some of that may have come into play to suppress top line growth. I dunno. I guess we'll have to wait until the actual 10-Q is posted on EDGAR to get an idea about where revenues came from/went to in the last quarter, and even then there may not be much guidance. There may be enough there to do some solving for "X", though. We'll see. In the mean time, I'll do some more cogitating on what numbers we do have. If I come up with anything enlightening, I'll post another message.