SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1161286)9/1/2019 10:30:05 PM
From: Sdgla3 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
IC720
isopatch

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573383
 
Temps haven’t been trending up... only your lies have. The NOAA proves you lie with data.


In order to address some of these problems, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) implemented, beginning in 2005, a new surface temperature measurement system in the U.S.

[The U.S. Climate Reference Network] includes 114 pristinely maintained temperature stations spaced relatively uniformly across the lower 48 states. NOAA selected locations that were far away from urban and land-development impacts that might artificially taint temperature readings.

Prior to the USCRN going online, alarmists and skeptics sparred over the accuracy of reported temperature data. With most preexisting temperature stations located in or near urban settings that are subject to false temperature signals and create their own microclimates that change over time, government officials performed many often-controversial adjustments to the raw temperature data. Skeptics of an asserted climate crisis pointed out that most of the reported warming in the United States was non-existent in the raw temperature data, but was added to the record by government officials.

The USCRN has eliminated the need to rely on, and adjust the data from, outdated temperature stations.

So–not to keep you in suspense–what does the USCRN show so far? No warming:




To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1161286)9/1/2019 11:20:41 PM
From: IC7203 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
isopatch
miraje

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573383
 
You may ignore the title. Also provides a history lesson.

"this downturn should be greater than the last one in the 1700s. Volatility rises, so the swings in climate become much more dramatic with the turn of these cycles.

These cycles in climate were originally discovered through analyzing ice core samples from the North Pole that revealed a 300-year cycle in climate defined as the energy output of the sun. When I saw the presentation presented by Harvard scientists back in the 1980s, I immediate saw their chart was close to the 309.6-year cycle in the ECM. We have documentation on the sun now, which is a thermodynamic system that beats like your heart. The cycle defines the maximum and minimum over a 300-year period and explains migrations and the rise and fall of civilization.

armstrongeconomics.com