Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Chromatics Color Sciences International. Inc; CCSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey W. Burke who wrote (874)	1/22/1998 3:29:00 PM
From: David S.	Respond to of 5736

Message 3207937 So, I was right in that the split was the idea of the guy from Lehman. amusing.

To: Jeffrey W. Burke who wrote (874)	1/22/1998 3:39:00 PM
From: aradu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5736

<<3rd. party reimbursement>> This may sound dumb, but could someone explain what this reimbursement means. I suspect it is an insurance terminology, but don't really know. Thanks in advance. Aradu.

To: Jeffrey W. Burke who wrote (874)	1/22/1998 8:04:00 PM
From: David S.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5736

just wondering if you could explain the statement made by the CEO, Darby Macfarlane regarding SPRX, "The technology they are using,which has NOT been proven to work, was developed several years ago. It wasn't accepted then and it won't be now." see - I said nothing inflammatory. PS - Arthur Guiry, the Prez., sold 30,000 shares on 12/1/97 at $14.75

To: Jeffrey W. Burke who wrote (874)	1/29/1998 2:26:00 PM
From: David S.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5736

from your post #874:"The technology they are using,which has NOT been proven to work, was developed several years ago. It wasn't accepted then and it won't be now. I'm sure when it is compared to our FDA APPROVED device ours will come out on top. As Darby put it,they(SPRX) put the "cart before the horse". Setting up distributors for something that has not been proven too work buy the FDA standards does not make sense, but thats not for us to worry about at this point. If and when they ever receive FDA approval (1-2 yrs) then we can consider them our competition." - These are statements from the CEO, Darby Simpson Macfarlane, we agree on that - yes? Unfortunately, we have a problem. If you can successfully answer the questions I will pose, then you should feel better in being long the stock, if you cannot, then you will ask yourself, "has Darby lied to us"? Don't worry, I already know the answer. We can do this in a civil fashion - I will be respectful and hopefully you will, too - agreed? #1 - Regarding SpectRX - "The technology they are using,which has NOT been proven to work, was developed several years ago. It wasn't accepted then and it won't be now." - This statement needs clarification.