Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Zonagen (zona) - good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: khrnyc who wrote (1955)	1/22/1998 2:03:00 PM
From: Tokyo VD	Respond to of 7041

Keith, You have been neither honest, fair, nor reasonable. So, until you start, you can just think of me as the guy who knows who you are, where you work, knows where you live, how and where you consult, what you like to eat, and obviously listens to you dream a little dream. Basically, you have not lived up to your end of the bargain of providing new insightful information, so I ask why I should reciprocate? Frankly, you are not the "voice" we should listen to Father Coughlin. Tokyo

To: khrnyc who wrote (1955)	1/22/1998 3:13:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7041

Just a few questions Keith... 1) Are you a member of the AMA? 2) Where do you teach? 3) Do you have any relationship whatsoever with Zonagen, any large investors in Zonagen or any "analysts" following Zonagen? 4) Why this sudden interest in promoting Zonagen's stock? BTW, I'm posting under my real name.

To: khrnyc who wrote (1955)	1/22/1998 4:59:00 PM
From: BDR	Respond to of 7041

Off topic << to reveal your true identities?>> Oh but it so much more fun to use a pseudonym in Cyberspace where you can be anything you want to be. One minute I can pretend to be Chairman Greenspan ("I can assure you the Fed will raise interest rates a full percentage point tomorrow"), the next I can be President Clinton ("This is Bill chatting with you online from the Lincoln Bedroom where I am engaged in a menage a trois (sp?) with Socks and Buddy.") Readers have only the content of your postings by which to judge your claims to identity. For example, above, the former is obviously a misrepresentation, the latter, sadly, could be true.