Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Satyr who wrote (14614)	1/22/1998 2:28:00 PM
From: hpeace	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

I have their recco, right after they reccoed. it went down, thenn up alittle and down to lower than their 37, then up to alittle higer and down below the 37 agian. if they would have recco'ed in may of 97 and then saifd get out. that's a good call. but they reccoed and it tanked. then 6 months later it's way up. and they didn't pan it til it crashed again. so they didn't call qntm, quite frankly qtntm is a good company and the best of the dd's. I have 1000's of dollars of their dlt's no mistake. I have the graph of their pice. you would have to say in a may 97 and out close to high. they put you in months early and out after they crashed. I wasn't panning qntm, I was panning HQ. qntm is great compnay, they just have to get thru the rough times. but, HQ DID NOT CALL QNTM AND WHAT TO DO CORRECTLY. by the way qntm is a certified cpq vendor. they put you in qntm and it was down months later, then after it crashed, they reccoed to hold... that's not a call.