Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (1162962)	9/9/2019 1:24:38 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 1571927

Message 32242747

To: maceng2 who wrote (1162962)	9/9/2019 1:35:18 PM
From: Jamie153	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571927

They've been writing this nonsense for years in non-peer reviewed papers. Here's one example of their work being decimated. Non-peer-reviewed manuscript falsely claims natural cloud changes can explain global warming "Flawed Reasoning: The authors' argument claims a correlation between cloud cover/relative humidity and global temperature proves that the former caused the latter without investigating whether they have the relationship backwards. Inadequate support: The source of their claimed global cloud dataset is not given, and no research on their proposed mechanism for climate change is cited. Fails to provide correct physical explanation: The manuscript incorrectly claims that the rise of atmospheric carbon dioxide is caused by release from ocean waters. It also provides no explanation for the claim that an increase in relative humidity causes global cooling." It's good to hear all sides but when one side is using fake science, well, that's fake science. Btw, this sort of nonsense is also published on dubious sites such as zerohedge.