Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (1163214)	9/10/2019 12:43:42 PM
From: Jamie153	Respond to of 1575621

Okay, answer this for me. When Bush stopped terrorizing Americans with his color codes did you notice? By this, I mean, after Obama was elected and after he stopped terrorizing Americans with color codes did you personally wonder what happened to the codes? I can't find anything online that anyone was upset when the codes went away. In fact, I can't find anything on it whatsoever. So, Bush used codes to scare the crap out of emotionally crippled republicans and Obama stopped it. That's how I see it. What am I getting wrong?

To: i-node who wrote (1163214)	9/10/2019 12:53:52 PM
From: Jamie153	Respond to of 1575621

I think a lot of people think republicans used 9/11 to get and keep power since it's so rare for Americans to be killed by terrorists. Why all the fuss? It's great for headlines but none of it was based on facts. Even CATO, which is 100% right wing nutty says our chances of being killed by a animal are higher than being attacked by a terrorist. Tell me the last time you saw someone killed by an animal. Never right? And yet they spent trillion on terrorism. I bet the war on terror was the biggest con in US history.