Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (150671)	9/10/2019 10:56:15 PM
From: ggersh	1 Recommendation Recommended By pak73 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218673

Fighting over peanuts? They also cite other concerns, including lack of transparency and the potential for fraud among Chinese-listed firms, saying the investment change will expose some $50 billion in retirement assets to material risks. Second, there is the issue of whether this is the way capitalism is supposed to work. It is popular now to argue that pension funds should think about the long-term interest of their clients when they invest; this may not always mean maximizing returns. For example, retirees need clear air to breathe when they retire. They also arguably need a China that doesn’t steal jobs and intellectual property from the U.S. There is sense in this, but also the danger that allocating capital will degenerate into a fight between different political priorities. If pensions, endowments, sovereign wealth funds and other forms of long-term capital are turned into political vehicles, then earning a return, and allocating capital to where it can be best used, will grow far harder. ROFL......popularity Global warming exists? It was sent free of charge End of the day at one time this might have been effective with the senators thinking ameriKa is numero uno w/out challenge.....that day has long passed