Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mama Bear who wrote (4485)	1/22/1998 4:01:00 PM
From: John D. Morrison	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 10479

You would defend to the death their right to make false and defamatory allegations about a company solely for the purpose of self-serving personal gain? I disagree with you strongly, about that, and about the potential of slander campaigns such as Mr. Crawford's to cause significant losses in stock prices. I have no problem with free speech. As long is it's the truth. John M.

To: Mama Bear who wrote (4485)	1/22/1998 4:25:00 PM
From: jinyao	Respond to of 10479

A product like Net+Arm can only go to extreme-either a biggest looser or a greatest winner. It has brought us both thirving possible promise and great difficulty. Consider its possible application in the market of O.A. /commerce /industry automation especially in home appliance industry, it is really a promising technology.----just imagine you can control your house's Heater/Air Conditioner/VCR/Security monitor from your office! But the diffculty to make this application possible adopted is HUGE! I'd guess FIBR will be either above 20 or below 4 a year later.

To: Mama Bear who wrote (4485)	1/22/1998 10:34:00 PM
From: David Wise	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

<< ...that the gov't limit our fundamental, Constitutional right to free speech.>> Barbara - no one has the right to shout "fire" in a crouded theatre. When someone posts known-to-be-false statements that cause someone else to lose money as they benefit, this is not protected by the Constitution. As far as truthful statements that would support a short position, I have no problem. This is freedom of speech. I hope that's what you meant. Otherwise, how will I know if you're telling the truth or just helping a "desperate" situation that you've gotten into? I do appreciate your posts. As for cc's, I think it's ruined today's SI line on FIBR. There are > 100 posts today - MOST are from or about this character. Other than possibly to refute something that can't be left unrefuted, this will be my ONLY comment on cc.

To: Mama Bear who wrote (4485)	1/22/1998 10:51:00 PM
From: craig crawford	Respond to of 10479

<< Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and to post it. Blaming today's drop on those posters is hogwash, and shows a lack of understanding of how the markets operate >> Stop talking like that, Barb, I might have to start respecting you. I hate to admit it but Barb is right. I was calling this company a joke all the way up from 2 to 6 so obviously I can't drive the price of the stock down. You guys are just a bunch of conspiracy freaks and it shows you are a bunch of amateurs with a lot to learn.