Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mama Bear who wrote (4490)	1/22/1998 4:40:00 PM
From: John D. Morrison	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

I'm sorry dear, but I think you are the one who missed the point. You say that you would defend Mr. Crawford's right to spew false accusations about FIBR all over the place, to the death. I say no one has the right to make defamatory statements about anyone or any company without solid, incontrovertible evidence to back it up. Mr. Crawford has not provided us with such evidence. Whether or not his statements had an impact on the price today is beside the point. Perhaps today's action was normal fluctuation. Or perhaps not. How can you be sure? Can you contact everyone who sold today and ask them if they chickened out because of Mr. Crawford's verbal diarrhea attack? I think not. John M.

To: Mama Bear who wrote (4490)	1/22/1998 4:51:00 PM
From: CMS27	Respond to of 10479

Barb, I may have it missed your post on this already, forgive me but I skipped most of the posts here today. I was just curious what you saw on your level II when we dropped this morning. Was it a few very large blocks, a lot of very large blocks or just lots and lots of small blocks? Not that it would necessarily mean anything, but I'm curious anyway. As for Craig Crawford, he was somewhat goaded into posting here. So we can't be too upset that he came here spewing his beliefs about Osicom. I have never found it worthwhile to challenge him. I did once and he brought our conversation to an end quickly by simply typing FIBR IS A SCAM. He will also revert to his "tale of the tape" theory when he has no counter argument for your points. I urge folks not to engage him, because he will not discuss FIBR at any level of intelligence. The few points he hangs his hat on are no more rooted in fact than the Barrons article. Barrons could be a genuine threat, they have far more reach than Craig Crawford. I would not write to the SEC over Craigs posting but I would and did over the Barrons article. Scott