To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (31771 ) 1/23/1998 10:10:00 AM From: Zoltan! Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 61433
>>There's a huge difference between strong women, Duncan, and ruthless women. You seem to confuse the two. Actually, you are confused. It is Hillary who is ruthless, ruthless for power and willing to sustain any blow to wield power that she was never given or entitled to wield. On the contrary, Clinton's modus operandi depends on women of weak mind and character - it takes strong women to take on the most powerful misogynist on Earth. The only dirty tricks are done by Clinton and cronies. They have pillioried any woman who dares to tell the truth. Gee, thanks to a recent court deposition now we know that Gennifer Flowers was telling the truth and that Clinton has been straight-faced lying to the American public for years. He will never be believed by decent people again - and that shall be his legacy whether he continues to stay on and demean the presidency or not. Sure, Clinton has done far worse, but the attorney general refuses to appoint independent counsels to investigate weightier matters concerning the vast panoply of Clinton scandals - illegal campaign fund raising, political misuse of FBI files, a compromised Justice Department, high-level lying about the doings of Hillary Clinton's health-care task force and political money conduits going all the way to Communist China. But in the end does it matter that Capone was brought down for not filing income taxes rather than his greater but legally unprovable crimes? Clinton has always used the means of the law to defeat the ends of justice. As one Solon has stated The question is whether truth can be denied by power. (In a republican deomocracy) Power must not be able to compel a lie" . Too bad that in Clinton's banana republic (pun intended), the liar is king.