SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Apple, Inc. Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: handyman who wrote (9068)9/26/2019 3:01:36 PM
From: Doren  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11191
 
trump is a traitor. Obviously. He tried to hire a foreign company to spy on his opponent in the next election.

Nothing else matters here.

His lame excuses only matter to his stubborn supporters who want what the want no matter what the morality. THEY are traitors too. The US should come first not your stock market or your wall.

Just imagine if this became the norm... every president trying to get every country we aid to spy on the other party.

Obviously Treason.

trumps lame pleas that he just wanted to get justice are pleas that only a trump follower could swallow. OTHER presidents use our investigative agencies... he uses foreigners? What bullshit.

What other people did he ask the Ukranians to investige? Just Biden? and it just so happens that coincidentally Biden was the leading candidate in an election against him?

If you still believe his bullshit you are either stupid or an immoral traitor.

----

The vast middle may not have wanted trump impeached for obstructing justice which he's clearly guilty of. And the Democrats know the coward republicans are afraid of trump and won't convict on that. They hate him too but they are just chicken shit.

Treason is another matter altogether for the vast middle.



To: handyman who wrote (9068)9/26/2019 3:28:38 PM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 11191
 
BOMBSHELL: The Trump-Ukraine scandal just got its Watergate-tapes moment
Nixon had tapes. Trump has transcripts.
By Dylan Matthews @dylanmatt dylan@vox.com Sep 26, 2019, 1:40pm EDT
vox.com

The anonymous whistleblower complaint about Donald Trump’s request that the president of Ukraine investigate Joe Biden’s son contains a number of stunning charges.

One of them is the allegation that White House officials moved what the whistleblower describes as the “official word-for-word transcript” of Trump and the Ukrainian president’s call to a “separate electronic system that is otherwise used to store and handle classified information of an especially sensitive nature” — even though a White House official said the call contained no sensitive national security information.

It gets worse: “This was ‘not the first time’ under this Administration that a Presidential transcript was placed into this codeword-level system solely for the purpose of protecting politically sensitive — rather than national security sensitive — information.”

The allegation, to be clear, is that the Trump administration has been stashing transcripts of normal phone calls Trump made in a highly classified storage system so that they don’t get out and embarrass the president.

President Trump arrives for a press conference in New York on September 25, 2019. Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty ImagesIt’s an action that raises plenty of troubling follow-up questions: Which other phone call transcript or transcripts are in that system? Who was Trump talking to? Why did Trump and his political advisers think the records had to be kept under lock and key? Do they contain anything like Trump’s efforts to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Biden family — essentially, to get a foreign power to assist him in the 2020 presidential campaign? Or do they contain evidence of something even worse?

Reporters and analysts who’ve been covering Trump’s foreign entanglements for years immediately latched on to this as a key allegation in the complaint. “This just got much bigger,” Greg Miller at the Washington Post declared. “This to me is most significant and what carries the news cycle for many days to come — what ELSE has the WH inappropriately put on a classified system?” NPR’s Tim Mak added.

One reason the alleged transcript vault feels like such a profound revelation is that it’s an echo of one of the biggest moments in the Watergate investigation. A key turning point came in July 1973 when Alexander Butterfield, a former aide in the Nixon White House, told investigators and then Congress that the president had a recording system in all his White House offices that taped his conversations.

White House aide Alexander Butterfield testifying during the Senate Watergate hearings on July 16, 1973. Steve Northup/The LIFE Images Collection via Getty Images
The importance of the Watergate tapes Leon Neyfakh’s Slow Burn podcast has a great episode on this moment. The revelation came almost by accident — as an afterthought. (Similarly, the note that this isn’t the first time the Trump administration has classified records of a presidential phone call was in the complaint’s appendix.)

Butterfield casually mentioned to Scott Armstrong and Don Sanders, two lawyers for the Senate Watergate Committee, as Armstrong recalls it, “I guess you guys must already know: The president has an automatic taping device in each of his offices.” Armstrong and Sanders did not know this nor did basically anyone else.

Within days, after Butterfield testified publicly before the committee, the whole country knew it.

Neyfakh includes a telling quote from a column written by Mary McCarthy at the time capturing the public mood: “The moral shock of learning that Nixon had been bugging … anybody who approached his offices … lost some of its impact in the general joyful feeling that the case was going to be resolved.”

For the next year or so, the Watergate fight became almost wholly consumed by the question of the tapes: who had access to them, in what way they could have access to them, and what their contents meant to the investigation.

Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor investigating the Watergate break-in, secured a subpoena forcing the White House to release the tapes, but Nixon refused to comply. On October 12, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the subpoena, effectively ordering Nixon to hand over the tapes. Nixon responded by offering Cox a compromise: John Stennis, a conservative Democratic senator from Mississippi, could listen to the tapes and verify they matched transcripts of them released by the White House. But Stennis was notoriously hard of hearing, and Cox would not agree to the deal.

Former Watergate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox after speaking with reporters on October 21, 1973, the morning after President Richard Nixon fired him. David Hume Kennerly/Getty Images
So ultimately, Nixon decided to have Cox fired. He wound up firing both his attorney general and his deputy attorney general when they refused to fire Cox in an event now known as the Saturday Night Massacre, which outraged the public so deeply that Nixon’s advisors pushed him hard to appoint another prosecutor. He did, picking Texas Democrat Leon Jaworski.

Jaworski had to appeal all the way to the Supreme Court, but in a unanimous ruling on July 24, 1974, the Court mandated the White House release the subpoenaed tapes. The White House finally complied, and on August 5, it released what became known as the “ smoking gun” recording, in which chief of staff HR Haldeman and Nixon, days after the break-in, discuss using the CIA to hamper the FBI’s investigative efforts. Three days later, Nixon resigned.

The tapes also famously included an 18.5-minute gap on June 20, 1972. The minutes are believed to include a conversation between Nixon and Haldeman about the Watergate arrests. Rose Mary Woods, Nixon’s secretary, claimed that she accidentally erased the portion, but due to how the taping system worked, it would have been almost physically impossible to do so.

Most plausible, according to Watergate reporter and expert Elizabeth Drew, is Nixon aide John Ehrlichman’s allegation that Nixon personally erased the tapes, presumably because they contained yet more discussion of a cover-up.

The analogy to Quid Pro KyivThis brings us to the Ukraine scandal. The transcript vault mirrors, almost eerily, the White House tapes in its importance.

One caveat here is that the whistleblower complaint describes an “official word-for-word transcript.” The memo the White House released is formatted like a transcript, but it was compiled from voice-recognition software and notes from people who listened to the call; it is not a verbatim record of what was said. The complaint suggests that a real transcript separate from the memo exists, hidden away in a classified storage system — but it was written before the White House memo was released, so it doesn’t explicitly distinguish between the two.

A truly word-for-word transcript could resolve definitely how explicit Trump was in demanding an investigation into Biden as a quid pro quo for arms sales and other aid to Ukraine. The possibility is strongly suggested by the readout of the call released by the White House, but a full transcript could be more damning if it includes more explicit transactional language. It could serve as a “smoking gun” transcript just as the conversation with Haldeman was the “smoking gun” tape of the Watergate scandal that forced Nixon’s resignation.

President Richard M. Nixon speaks with his chief of staff, H.R. Haldeman, in the White House. Haldeman was later convicted for his role in the Watergate scandal. President Nixon was eventually forced to resign. Corbis via Getty ImagesBut there are other parallels too. The Nixon administration fought tooth and nail to prevent the tapes from being released. Similarly, the high level of classification placed on the transcript vault — or, more precisely, the choice to stash the transcripts in a system that required code-word clearance to access — suggests the administration won’t give the Ukraine transcript up easily, even in response to a congressional subpoena. With Robert Mueller’s investigation over, there is no special counsel to fight for the transcript’s release alongside Congress. But the subpoena power of Democratic committee chairs in the House could on its own augur such a fight.

Finally, both the tapes and the transcript vault could contain multitudes. The White House tapes proved not only that Nixon was involved in covering up the Watergate break-in, but that he was a vicious anti-Semite who traded conspiracy theories with his aide Henry Kissinger and that then-California Gov. Ronald Reagan went on a racist rant to Nixon assailing “those monkeys from those African countries” at the UN.

The transcript vault, per the whistleblower, doesn’t just contain the Ukraine transcript. There’s more where that came from. We could be only at the beginning of the process of discovering all that’s there to find.



To: handyman who wrote (9068)9/26/2019 3:35:34 PM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 11191
 
FBI arrests another of Benedict Donald's domestic terrorists, wanted to bomb CNN, Beto, antifa:

Jarrett William Smith: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

By Ellyn Santiago
Updated Sep 23, 2019 at 7:10pm


Facebook

Jarrett William Smith is a U.S. Army soldier arrested by the FBI on charges accusing him of discussing plans to “bomb a major U.S. news network,” according to a federal criminal complaint. While it was not named in court documents, CNN is reporting that it was the news network targeted by Smith.

“I want to assure everyone that there was never any imminent threat to any CNN locations,” CNN President Jeff Zucker said in a memo to staff.

Memo from CNN prez Jeff Zucker: "I want to assure everyone that there was never any imminent threat to any CNN locations. We continue to actively monitor these issues on a daily basis and work closely with our security teams around the world and our partners in law enforcement."

— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) September 23, 2019

“We continue to actively monitor these issues on a daily basis and work closely with our security teams around the world and our partners in law enforcement.”

The 24-year-old soldier, a South Carolina native, also talked about targeting Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke, attacking anti-fascists and traveling to Ukraine to fight for a violent far-right militant group, Azov Battalion according to the criminal complaint. The FBI also accuses Smith of distributing information online about “how to build bombs.”

According to the federal complaint, Smith, who has been stationed at Fort Riley in Kansas since July, “has been in communication with another American, Craig Lang, who traveled to Ukraine and fought with another far-right group, the Right Sector.”

The Department of Justice has charged Smith with one count of distributing information related to explosives and weapons of mass destruction based on a Facebook post where he is alleged to have provided instructions for building bombs.

The FBI charging document says that in a Facebook chat, Smith offered to “teach other Facebook users how to make cellphone explosive devices ‘in the style of the Afghans.'”

The FBI also said undercover agents engaged with Smith: “On Aug. 19, 2019, Smith told an undercover investigator he was looking for ‘radicals’ like himself. Smith talked about killing members of Antifa and destroying nearby cell towers or a local news station.”

Smith faces a maximum of two decades in federal prison if convicted. Smith is originally from Conway, South Carolina. It is not clear if he has been appointed an attorney who could speak on his behalf. His family could not be reached for comment.

Here’s what you need to know:

1. The FBI Says Smith Hoped to Fight With a Far-Right Group in Ukraine, but Would Join the US Army if He Could Not Find a ‘Slot’ in Paramilitary Group Azov Battalion

Jarrett William Smith

In March 2019, the FBI got a tip that on a Facebook account belonging to Smith were instructions on how to build an improvised explosive device and spoke about his desire to travel to Ukraine to fight with the Ukraine-based violent far-right paramilitary group, Azov Battalion,” the complaint says.

Back in 2016, before he enlisted in the U.S. Army, Smith met with a man in El Paso, Texas, named Craig Lane who the FBI says traveled to Ukraine and fought with the Right Sector, another group in Ukraine similar to the Azov Battalion, between 2017 and 2019, according to the complaint. The FBI says the Facebook communication between the two men showed Lang was mentoring Smith and the soldier planned to go and join the violent far-right group. In a June 2016 conversation, Smith said he had “No former military experience, but if I cannot find a slot in Ukraine by October I’ll be going into the Army … To fight is what I want to do. I’m willing to listen, learn, and train. But to work on firearms is fine by me too,” the complaint states.

According to the complaint, Lang said, “Alright, I’ll forward you over to the guy that screens people he’ll most likely add you soon … Also as a pre-warning if you come to this unit and the government comes to shut down the unit you will be asked to fight. You may also be asked to kill certain people who become on the bad graces of certain groups.”


Delegates attend the first congress of the new political party “National Corps”, created from the members of “Azov” civil corps and veterans of “Azov” regiment of the National Guard of Ukraine and volunteers in Kiev on October 14, 2016. The party’s statute is based on the ideology of Ukrainian nationalism, priority of national interests, Ukrainian language as the only state language, recognition of Russia as an enemy to Ukraine.

According to the complaint, Smith joined the U.S. Army on June 12, 2017. Following his initial entry training at Fort Benning, his first duty station was in Fort Bliss, Texas beginning in late November of 2017. As an infantry soldier, he trained in combat and tactical operations, the complaint reads.

A few weeks after landing in Texas, Smith and Lang spoke in a Facebook chat where Smith talked about his ability to build IED’s: “Oh yeah, I got knowledge of IEDs for days. We can make cell phone IEDs in the style of the Afghans. I can teach you that. .. ” he wrote in the chat, the FBI says. And then, went on to detail how to “construct a cell phone detonator for an IED” that the complaint reads was, “according to an FBI Special Agent Bomb Technician with whom I consulted, is accurate.”

When a chat group member asked about the explosive, Smith explained “how to manufacture an explosive material using the heads of matches,” according to court documents. But an FBI Special Agent Bomb Technician said of the bomb instructions, they were “not accurate if the wrong type of matches are used. They are accurate, however, if the right type of matches were to be used.”

A private first class, Smith was transferred from Texas to Fort Riley, Kansas on July 8, 2019.

2. Smith Discussed a Plan to Conduct an Attack in the US, Was Looking for ‘More Radicals’ to Join in & ‘Kill Members of the Far Left Group Antifa’ & Talked About ‘Destroying’ a News Cell Tower, the FBI Says

Facebook

According to the complaint, in August 2019, Smith “engaged” with an FBI confidential source in an online chat group and “discussed a plan of conducting an attack within the United States and that he was looking for more ‘radicals’ like himself.”

Smith talked to the FB informant “about killing members of the far-left group, Antifa, as well as destroying nearby cell towers or local news station.”


PORTLAND, OR – AUGUST 17: Members of Antifa pass a fountain during an alt-right rally on August 17, 2019 in Portland, Oregon. Anti-fascism demonstrators gathered to counter-protest a rally held by far-right, extremist groups. (Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)

Two days later, the complaint reads, Smith told the informant that the “headquarters of a major American news network would be a suggested target, utilizing a vehicle bomb.”

This is that conversation with the name of the major news station not used. CNN reports that it is the network described in the complaint:

SMITH: [major news network] headquarters.

CS: That would make a statement.

SMITH: A large vehicle bomb. Fill a vehicle full of [various explosive materials], then fill a ping pong ball with [commonly available chemical] via drilling then injection. Put the ball in the tank of the vehicle and leave. 30 minutes later, BOOM.”

In the complaint, an FBI agent wrote that Smith’s “instructions would not result in a viable explosive device.”

Nonetheless, just last week, on September 20, Smith told an FBI undercover employee (UC), while Smith was using the “moniker Anti-Kosmik 2182, on the messaging app Telegram, that “…you may have a use for my knowledge and told me to contact you. What’s up?”

3. Calling Himself Anti-Kosmik on Telegram, Smith Told an FBI Undercover Agent How to Build a Bomb With ‘Enough Power to Take Out a Car,’ Feds Say

Jarrett William Smith used the name Anti-Kosmik 2182 on Telegram.

The conversation between the FBI undercover agent and Smith went like this, the complaint say:

UC: Thanks brother. Have an idea. Just don’t know the specifics on how to build it. , [PROTECT IDENTITY] said you knew your shit and would be someone good to talk to.

SMITH: What do you have in mind?

UC: Something that has enough power to take out a car and anything inside and something stable easy/enough to take from OK to TX?

SMITH: Ok. I think I have an idea for you. You will need [various household chemicals and commonly-available equipment]. You can keep all the materials separate until it’s time. Plus the randomness will aid you in the case of searches and the materials themselves usually aren’t considered suspicious.

[SMITH then gave further, very specific instructions for the ‘ construction of an explosive device. According to an FBI Special Agent Bomb Technician with whom I consulted, however, SMITH’s instructions would not result in a viable explosive device.]

UC: I am reading and thinking but this looks really good. I like the fact that everything is stuff you find around the house.

SMITH: That’s the best way to fight people. Making AK-47s out of expensive parts is cool, but imagine of you will if you were going to WalMart instead of gun store to buy weapons.

UC: Perfect.

SMITH: Are you looking for any other interesting tricks?

UC: I’ll take anything you got. This is not my area of expertise. Just want to make sure the target is gone.

SMITH: What’s the target?

UC: TX politician

SMITH: What level? Mayor? State rep? Senator?

UC: I have a few. Primary, secondary, tertiary. Ideally, fed Gov, Congress. But know I can get close on other. Been looking.”

The plan was to build a “Middle East style bomb” that could “damage or destroy US military vehicles and obliterate civilian vehicles and people nearby,” the charging documents say.


?

The conversation between Smith and the undercover federal agent gets very dark and very specific.

SMITH: You would need [various chemicals and equipment], a large amount of either black powder or smokeless powder, and a cell phone with active service.

UC: I got money. Just need the knowledge. I was thinking of something stable so I could drive down but I could construct it down there.

SMITH: I’ll include the instructions. This is a Middle East style bomb that if big· enough or connected to the right explosive can damage or destroy US military vehicles. Most of the time it can obliterate civilian vehicles and people nearby.

SMITH: [SMITH then gave further, very specific instructions for constructing an explosive device, all of which have been determined by an FBI Special Agent Bomb Technician to be viable. At the end, SMITH cautioned: “Be very careful with the fully armed device. There have been cases where Middle Eastern insurgents built these bombs only for them to detonate prematurely because of telemarketers or people with wrong numbers who unwittingly called the devices and ended up accidentally blowing up the insurgents.”]

UC: This is incredible. Thank you.

SMITH: If you want a quick and cheap gas grenade, a [combination of commonly available chemicals] will work. [Instructions for activating the device]. Blows in 8- 15 seconds. One hell of a wallop and it leaves behind a cloud of toxic chlorine gas.
u. UC: Having these ideas opens up my thinking. Take all that you got and appreciate
it.

SMITH: Last one for a quick incendiary/HE grenade. Tape a firecracker to a [commonly available household item]. You only need one for good effect, but you can get a HUGE explosion and a good fire going if you can tape 4 or 5 together. Simply ignite the firecracker and throw the device. Hope you’re fast on your feet, this one also gets loud. I consulted an FBI Special Agent Bomb Technician, who told me this recipe would likely result in construction of a viable device, although he believes anyone using this device would be within range of the device when it exploded.

4. The Target Was Supposed to be a ‘Liberal’ Texan, the FBI Says. Smith Suggested Beto O’Rourke, According to Court Docs


GettyBeto O’Rourke

The FBI undercover agent tells Smith that he has a type of person as a target in mind, maybe a “liberal Texas Mayor.”

Well I’d be the fastest moving Aryan you ever seen. But, also awesome idea. Got a liberal texas mayor in my sights! Boom with that IED and that dude’s dead.

SMITH: There ya go.

UC: You got anyone down in Texas that would be a good fit for fire, destruction
and death?.

MITH: Outside of Beto? I don’t know enough people that would be relevant
enough to cause a change if they died.

5. Before he Was Arrested, the FBI Says Smith Admitted He Provides Bomb-Making Instructions Online to People Who Are Planning to ‘Cause Harm’ & He Did So to ‘Cause Chaos’


Jarrett William Smith

Before Smith was arrested on September 21, he told the FBI in a “Mirandized interview,” meaning where he was read his rights before he spoke with agents, that he “admitted he knows how to make improvised explosives devices, and that in online chat rooms he routinely provides instruction on building explosive devices. The complaint says that he admitted “that he provides this information even to individuals who tell him they intend to use the information to cause harm to others.” He told agents that he did this to cause “chaos,” the complaint reads.

“He told me that if chaos results in the death of people, even through information he provided, it doesn’t affect him,” the agent wrote in the complaint.

heavy.com