Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: vegetarian who wrote (44537)	1/22/1998 5:51:00 PM
From: Gary Wisdom	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Michael Coley, what do I win for guessing EXACTLY that gm would be 33% this quarter? Whatever I win I guess will offset being off $200 MM in revenues. <ggg> I was right on net income too. Oh yea, did I say "after tax"? I meant "pre-tax" of course.

To: vegetarian who wrote (44537)	1/22/1998 5:51:00 PM
From: williet	Respond to of 58324

E-Mail IOM and tell them just how you feel and the reasons. They will listen won't they??????????????????? williet

To: vegetarian who wrote (44537)	1/22/1998 7:48:00 PM
From: KM	Respond to of 58324

<<After tomorrow's carnage, the ideal time to short would be on a bounce toward neckline (venture guess of about 10-11 range if it gets that far).Splitting shares was a STUPID move.>> I don't think we're dealing with your basic rocket scientists in management here. I agree totally with you on the chart - I'm shorting this sucker at the first chance I get. I've resisted the attempts to lump it in with the drive stocks, but no more. I think I will also resist the temptation to repost my comments on the split exactly 6 minutes after it was announced and again about 10 minutes later, where I compared it to the split in AMAT and CPQ. BTW, I think it was Philip Davis who told me he emailed Cramer and asked him if IOM was a drive stock, and Cramer said "yes".