Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Zonagen (zona) - good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tokyo VD who wrote (1966)	1/22/1998 6:26:00 PM
From: dino	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7041

Tokyo VD, It has been so long since I have heard you mention or discuss your opinion of the company & its prospects, I had no idea which way you favored (ie. long or short). It seems from this post you are long. I would be curious to hear your opinion of what you think of Zonagen's future for two reasons: 1) I do value your opinion & apparent medical knowledge base 2) Maybe it will bring this thread back to discussing the investment opportunities Zonagen provides. After all, that is what brought us all here, correct!? All this finger pointing & name calling accomplishes nothing & belongs on the playground (refering to the recent month of posts & not focusing on the last couple hours)!! Happy investing & thanks in advance Tokyo VD...........

To: Tokyo VD who wrote (1966)	1/23/1998 5:54:00 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7041

Linda, I just read Tokyo's post: <<"If you want vapid levity, don't bother reading my posts. If you want meaningful data and analysis, you will find it here. I don't expect the short sellers to be very happy with the data I will present, but neither am I trying to advocate for those with a long position. I will simply try to provide information and resources with which you can make your own informed decisions. Dr Rubin ">>. ***************************** I think you may have some valid points about spreading somebgody's identity on the thread against his wishes, and as much as I honor and respect a true Vivusite,gg, I think that Tokyo may have a point. As you know I personally stated on the web that my advise is very personal, it is my opinion, if you follow it you may not be followint the correct investment (n Vivus ), that the Vivus thread for me is entertainment, and so I went out of my way to make it clear to any new thread readers that investing is a very dangerous field, that you can loose lots of money etc and that it behooves everybody to do their own DD and CAREFULLY evaluate the VERACITY of ALL the data presented. Dr Rubin presented himself in this forum in the above very serious tone, stating that he will present accurate data and " If you want meaningful data and analysis, you will find it here ". this would suggest to a new reader that his ddata are true, meaningfull and can toatlly be relied upon for investment decisions. Well, I treat my investment decisions in the same way I treat my patients: VERY seriously. So before I reccommend a therapy I need to know everything about the drug , it's authors, who pays them, their training, where were their data presented , how good was the Journal etc. In the same fashion therefore If Dr Rubin is going to pesent himself as a credible investing witness then I think that he needs to expect the same close scrutiny afforded to MDs presenting drugs to other MDs. TA