SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications-News Only!!! (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Duke who wrote (1015)1/22/1998 7:37:00 PM
From: Maverick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1629
 
Washington, D.C.-area Internet service providers (ISP)
had a pretty busy day yesterday in the realm of mergers &
acquisitions. Corporate ISP and backbone provider PSINet
(Nasdaq: PSIX) received a surprise $10 per share cash
offer from the former CEO of Digex. Meanwhile, privately
held Erols, a primarily consumer-oriented ISP operating
from Washington to Massachusetts, agreed to be acquired
by competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC) RCN Corp.
(Nasdaq: RCNC) for $83.5 million in cash and stock. The
tales of the two companies couldn't be more different from
the viewpoint of shareholders, though.

Shareholders in PSINet have gotten a big fat nothing for
their investment. Since coming public in 1995, PSINet has
generated a negative annual return to shareholders of 32%
per year. That's not to say that PSINet hasn't done a good
job in transforming itself from a consumer dial-up service to
a heavier-duty corporate services company. PSINet also
announced yesterday that its per-customer contract values
are going up, which is central to the company's strategy.
Has this paid off for shareholders? Nope. And if a vote goes
through tomorrow that gives CLEC IXC Communications
(Nasdaq: IIXC) 20% of PSINet, shareholders had better hope the company turns around
this trend of negative shareholder return if they want to hold onto their company. In
exchange for 10,000 route miles of OC-48 fiber, PSINet is trading 20% of its shares.
According to the most recent 10-Q, if IXC's stake in PSINet doesn't reach $240 million in
value within a year of completing delivery of this fiber, PSINet will have to make up the
difference between that target and the market value of the stock by either issuing more
equity or coming up with cash.

Boardwatch magazine, an ISP trade journal, recently said that IXC can deliver that fiber
within three years. So PSINet will have to grow shareholder value by 42% per year over
the next four years if shareholders don't want to be diluted by this deal. For instance, if
PSI only grows shareholder value at 20% per year over the next four years, shareholders
will have to give up another 20% of PSI's equity to IXC. Some shareholders would say
right now, "Take the cash from the group led by the Digex CEO." Based on other mergers
and acquisitions in the industry, the current offer of 1.7 times estimated 1998 revenues is
fair.



To: Duke who wrote (1015)1/22/1998 7:38:00 PM
From: Maverick  Respond to of 1629
 
In the other deal announced yesterday, Erols is being taken out at a fair 1.9 times its
run-rate (annualized from the most recent quarter) revenues. One could say there's far
more room for Erols to grow, but the original owners are getting out at a price of about 20
times the equity capital they have contributed to the company. PSINet is currently valued
at about 1.4 times contributed equity capital. By that measure alone, Erols has been an
unqualified investment success while PSI has been flat, at best. Asset-wise, PSINet's
national network is very attractive and it's a shame that more value has not been
realized. On assets alone, PSINet is undervalued, but the vote to do the deal with IXC
takes place tomorrow, and the market thinks the deal will be approved. If so, current
shareholders will have to experience world-class investment returns over the next four
years or be diluted, possibly heavily. Based on what PSINet's management has done in
the past, some shareholders aren't holding their breath.
From Motley Foll's Lunch Time news



To: Duke who wrote (1015)1/23/1998 1:36:00 AM
From: blankmind  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1629
 
What the big guys want from DSL
By Jim Davis
January 21, 1998, 1:40 p.m. PT
Intel (INTC), Microsoft (MSFT), and Compaq (CPQ) have reportedly agreed to promote digital subscriber line (DSL) technology, but the specific roles the companies are likely to play will be key for advancing the high-speed Net access scheme.

The largest and most influential companies in personal computing are expected to announce next week at a communications conference in Washington that they are working with four of five regional Bell telephone operators (RBOCs) to develop hardware and software for high-speed connections to the Internet, as reported yesterday.

Individually, Intel, Microsoft, and Compaq are expected to reveal what initiatives they are undertaking to make high-speed access to the Internet easier. Essentially, the plan is to allow buyers of DSL modems and DSL-equipped computers to make a call to their service provider, plug in their modem or computer, and, connect--presto!--to the Internet at speeds which approach 30 times today's modems.

Intel's main interest is in promoting the use of the Universal Serial Bus (USB) port, a comparatively high-speed connection on new PCs hitting the market. By connecting the modem through this port rather than the Ethernet network interface card required by most DSL modems, installation is simplified. Intel demonstrated a USB modem with ADSL technology from Alcatel last year at the Fall Comdex exposition.

As recently as six months ago, Intel was toying with the idea of getting into the DSL chipset business as a part of its networking products group, but apparently hasn't made any serious moves yet, says Dean McCarron, an analyst with Mercury Research. Intel actually once manufactured modems but exited that business in 1994.

"Ultimately, the issue is that Intel wants PCs to have high bandwidth access," McCarron notes. With more content coming in to the PC, increasingly powerful processors will be required in systems.

McCarron is somewhat skeptical that Intel can do much to speed DSL adoption. "Realistically, the deployment rates are such that it's an option available to some small subset of the population," he says. Even with cooperation of the three PC industry companies they "won't make the [ telecommunications] infrastructure go from zero to 100 percent overnight," he observes, referring to the need for the regional telephone companies involved to upgrade their own equipment.

Another necessary element for widespread availability of DSL technology is a standardized way for modems and central phone office equipment to talk with each other. Currently, various flavors of the technology have been rolled out in different regions.

The United Nations' International Telecommunication Union is conducting meetings to standardize DSL technologies so that a modem from any vendor will interoperate with equipment installed by the RBOC.

All three PC companies are expected to talk next week about how they will contribute to the standardization of DSL "lite," or "splitterless" DSL. Typically, a DSL-enabled household requires that the phone company install a telephone line "splitter" that divides the a line into upstream (from the home to the carrier), downstream (from the carrier to the home), and voice components. DSL lite does away with this requirement.

A formal agreement upon a standard that will allow users of different DSL flavors to communicate with each other might not come until this fall, though. That timetable would make the goal of widespread DSL service by Christmas this year farfetched, according to analysts.

Not unlike Intel's involvement, Microsoft's involvement in the effort stems from an effort to continue to grow revenues at a rapid clip. "The deal is that...all the things that they want to do to grow financially essentially depends on a larger pipe being available," said Chris LeTocq, software analyst with Dataquest.

With the extra bandwidth available from DSL and presumably more viewers, Microsoft can expand ad and subsciption revenues from its various content ventures, including its partnership with NBC, as well as a number of regional and commerce-related Web sites. All that remains for Microsoft to add to its operating system are drivers for DSL lite modems, a relatively simple task, LeTocq says.

Compaq, the world's largest PC maker, is likely to discuss its intention to offer DSL technology in new computers as a way to help drive demand for DSL service. McCarron thinks that Compaq could offer DSL as an add-in card option on a wide range of systems within the next few years. Compaq declined to comment.

If all goes well in the standards process, Compaq, Intel, and Microsoft could help DSL be deployed sooner by 12 to 18 months if they are successful in generating some pull from end users, according to Beth Gauge, an analyst with Telechoice, a telecommunications industry research firm.