Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1167609)	9/29/2019 8:01:00 PM
From: Brumar89	3 Recommendations Recommended By pocotrader rdkflorida2 Wharf Rat Respond to of 1574664

2soon2b4got10 Is it me or is the GOP getting dumber and dumber?? George Conway just ripped Lindsey Graham a new one for his claim that “hearsay” evidence could not be used against Trump in an impeachment trial..... @gtconway3d .....It has been a while since you’ve practiced law, so let me help: * @realDonaldTrump’s incriminating statements are binding admissions against him and are not hearsay under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2);... under Rule 804(b)(3)‘ s exception to the hearsay rule for statements against penal or other interest; * To the extent Trump was involved in a criminal conspiracy with... @RudyGiuliani, Giuliani’s statements are also admissible against Trump and are not hearsay under Rule 801(d)(2)(E); * The memorandum of Trump’s call with Zelensky is admissible under as many as four separate exceptions to the hearsay rule—namely, Rules 803(1) (present sense impression), 803(5) (recorded recollection), 803(6) (record of a regularly conducted activity), and 803(8) (record of a public office). * In any event, you can be indicted in this country on the basis of hearsay. It happens all the time. And an impeachment is the constitutional equivalent of an indictment. So it follows that the House can consider hearsay in deciding whether to begin an impeachment inquiry, just as prosecutors can consider hearsay in deciding whether to convene a grand jury. So your argument, Senator, is pure garbage, even assuming that the rules of evidence apply in the impeachment process. But that assumption is trash, too. The hearsay rule needn’t apply even in a Senate trial ..... 11:23 AM - Sep 28, 2019

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1167609)	9/29/2019 8:14:43 PM
From: ryanaka	1 Recommendation Recommended By sylvester80 Respond to of 1574664

And he will be executed posthumously. His ashes will be spread onto the sewage water overflowing in rising sea water due to climate change. Mark my word. Donald Trump will be executed posthumously when the climate change casualties are too great to bear

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1167609)	9/30/2019 6:55:48 AM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Recommended By rdkflorida2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574664

Adam Kinzinger?Verified account @RepKinzinger FollowFollow @RepKinzinger More Adam Kinzinger Retweeted Donald J. Trump I have visited nations ravaged by civil war. @realDonaldTrump I have never imagined such a quote to be repeated by a President. This is beyond repugnant. Adam Kinzinger added, Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump ....If the Democrats are successful in removing the President from office (which they will never be), it will cause a Civil War like fracture in this Nation from which our Country will never heal.” Pastor Robert Jeffress, @FoxNews Show this thread 6:59 PM - 29 Sep 201 Traitor President threatens civil war if he's constitutionally removed.