Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1169347)	10/8/2019 12:29:00 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571928

Yep, anything but allow the reader to be granted some native intelligence and allow them to make up their own minds. Yep it's control freakery, and big brother knows best all the way. News update... Big brother is usually totally fking wrong. Man Made Climate change is not in the least "broadly accepted". The governments of China and India will laugh in your face and thank you for being a total sucker for starters, along with most of their populations. They have businesses to run and welcome the self imposed competitive restrains the West is hampering themselves with. and one or two other people know that the words "broadly accepted" usually mean "totally fking wrong". History abounds with example, and in science especially. Most (if not all) of Einsteins tutors thought he was dumb, and thought his PhD paper on Relativity below the standards set for the day. . Time teaches us all though, and this global warming phase will be no exception. Historically the climate data sets have predictive odds that are set heavily against you and retards who pass for climate scientists these days. Your brain is so addled with the crap you have been feeding it, you cannot even realize that can you ? The data has been selectively taken in a number of cases to produce a certain result.. You have been informed of that fact, and you just plainly deny that. That is called denial. In case you need reminding, I am a "climate change acceptor" as I have coined the term. I do critically evaluate the data, I dont suffer from a political agenda to "prove" a certain result. I am more interested in what is really going on. Sadly, just like with tobacco and lung cancer, the scientists have focused on bullchit only and moneyed interests seek a certain result in their favour. Religious fervor abounds to a given expected result and precious little scientific debate occurs.