SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jay who wrote (14976)1/22/1998 9:26:00 PM
From: Gottfried  Respond to of 70976
 
Jay, >we probably have similar stocks<

And similar losses? <G> But it is only temporary.
The upside potential is...blah, blah

> I hereby request you to update the charts on
a weekly (or quicker) cycle.
<

I'll update within the next two hours. Please feel free
to suggest improvements, different time scales etc.

GM



To: Jay who wrote (14976)1/22/1998 9:40:00 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Respond to of 70976
 
LA Times article: Murphy's Law: For Long Run, You Can't Own Enough Tech
By TOM PETRUNO
1-20-98
A popular rule of thumb among financial planners is that an
individual investor should subtract his or her age from 100,
and the resulting figure is the percentage of the person's assets that
should be in stocks.
That's only partly right, says Michael Murphy, editor of the
California Technology Stock Letter and a well-known name around
Silicon Valley. Subtract your age from 100 and that's the
percentage of your total assets that should be invested in technology
stocks alone, Murphy argues.
With the hammering many tech stocks have taken in recent
months, the idea of concentrating one's stock assets in tech no
doubt chills many investors. But Murphy insists he's just being a
realist. Name another economic sector with the long-term growth
prospects of tech, he challenges.
He has history on his side: Over the last 10 years, the average
technology stock mutual fund has soared 498%, according to
Lipper Analytical Services. That far exceeds the 393% gain of the
average Standard & Poor's 500 index fund, as well as the 345%
gain of the average general U.S. stock fund.
Past performance isn't necessarily indicative of future results, of
course. And Murphy, though normally a very astute and
soft-spoken observer of the Silicon Valley scene from his perch in
Half Moon Bay, arguably has more reason to resort to hyperbole
today about tech, as he travels the country promoting his new book,
"Every Investor's Guide to High-Tech Stocks & Mutual Funds"
(Broadway Books, $27.50).
But in the context of a slowing global economy (courtesy of East
Asia) and the struggle many U.S. industries would face boosting
earnings even without Asia's woes, Murphy's point about the tech
business' long-term growth prospects is well-taken.
Investors who fear that the technology industry will simply fall off
a cliff one of these days fail to grasp how large and diverse the
business has become worldwide, and how integral it now is to daily
life in the office, the factory and the home, Murphy says.
More important, the use of technology has reached such critical
mass that with continuing innovation and improvement in computers,
software and telecommunications, "these companies drive their own
demand," he says.
Case in point: "Five years ago, who knew they needed an e-mail
address?" Murphy asks. Today, if you have e-mail you can't
imagine life without it. If you don't have it, chances are you will.
Still, the rapid pace of change in tech also assures that it will
continue to be one of the market's most volatile sectors, with plenty
of losers for every big winner, says Murphy, who became a
computer programmer in 1965 (anyone remember COBOL?) and
has been tracking tech stocks since 1970.
What's more, tech companies are forever at risk of "profitless
prosperity," Murphy concedes: Demand may be great for a
particular product, but ever-increasing competition may keep a tech
company's bottom line from growing much, if at all, despite strong
sales.
So his stock-picking advice (which naturally is the centerpiece of
his new book) focuses on a few formulas that Murphy says have
proved themselves over the years:
* Buy tech companies that are already profitable and that
continue to spend heavily on research and development. He wants
to see a company's R&D total at least 7% of sales.
Wall Street may not immediately reward management that
spends a lot on R&D--in fact, the biggest spenders' stocks may be
depressed because R&D cuts into current profits, Murphy notes.
But long-term, effective R&D spending means "new products,
dominant market share, high margins and high rates of growth," he
says.
Murphy calls these stocks "growth-flow" issues. He includes in
this group such well-known names as Intel, software firm Adobe
Systems, phone-call-processing systems firm Aspect
Telecommunications and telecom equipment company Tellabs.
* Stick with the five industry leaders. Murphy argues that Intel,
Microsoft, database software firm Oracle, computer-networking
giant Cisco Systems and semiconductor-manufacturing-equipment
company Applied Materials are "so far ahead [of their competition],
they aren't going to be caught" any time soon.
That's debatable in the fast-moving tech world, of course, but
Murphy insists those five names make up a great core tech
portfolio. The recent plunge in the stocks of Oracle and Applied
Materials is a gift for long-term investors, he says.
* Buy into the next wave of biotech products. Murphy believes
that biotech is on the verge of a boom in federal approvals for new
products to treat many chronic diseases of aging, including diabetes
and cancer.
Some of his favorite biotech names include Chiron, Ligand
Pharmaceuticals and CoCensys.