SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marcher who wrote (62860)10/12/2019 11:09:26 PM
From: Elroy Jetson  Respond to of 71463
 
PG&E notified customers for two days before November 8 that it might shut down power due to a forecast of 35 mph winds and low humidity compounding the conditions of a multi-year long drought.

Ultimately, PG&E did not shut off the power and 87 people died in the resulting 2018 Camp Fire.

Most who built their homes in high-risk mountain areas don't want a repeat of this catastrophe.

But today, some PG&E mountain customers are insisting their electricity never be interrupted - regardless of how many people die due to their demands.

In the time of Trump, this level of pathological selfishness is not surprising, but we can't give into their demands.

These communities can be rebuilt to accommodate the current hotter and drier conditions, but as in Greece and Spain, few home owners are inclined to spend the money needed to do so.

Climate change costs just associated with burying power lines is more than residents are willing to pay, even amortized over 30 years with debt.

Regions potentially subject to preemptive power outages due to high winds coupled with dry conditions below 5% humidity



To: marcher who wrote (62860)10/13/2019 2:38:53 AM
From: maceng21 Recommendation

Recommended By
marcher

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71463
 
It sounds to me like the monopoly PG&E need to be taken down a peg or two.

If the fire risk is such a big deal, why have they not yet put the power distribution underground?

The link say it's poorly maintained infrastructure, that is the reason why the wild fires started, they also have shown safe "above ground" solutions already part of the distribution network.

Sounds to me "the people" should stick it to PG&E, and the insurance companies too. Big time.

What are the so called "smart guys" in Silicon Valley doing about it?

Looks to me they cannot innovate their way out of a cardboard box without a lid.