Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jim kelley who wrote (16413)	1/22/1998 11:13:00 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

I disagree Jim, she should simply tell the truth. After all she is under oath. Or does nothing matter anymore?? Mike

To: jim kelley who wrote (16413)	1/23/1998 11:17:00 AM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

You mean President Clinton and Vernon Jordan will screw Monica if she cracks? I think she should just tell the truth, whatever that might be. If she does not tell the truth to the grand jury, she would be committing perjury. Why should she take the risk of having a felony conviction? I don't think Clinton and Jordan would really be in positions to "screw" her if she tells the truth. Don't forget that there is an independent investigation going on regarding things like her White House access late at night as recently as a month ago, the gifts Clinton has admitted giving her, and perhaps Clinton leaving messages on her message machine, which are purportedly on Linda Tripp's tapes. Which story should she stick to? The one on the tapes, or the signed affidavit? She is in a little bit of a muddle, having told two totally different stories, in a way.