SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (1171551)10/16/2019 4:07:14 PM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572632
 
sure....

AGW is sooooooooooooooo complex, that is it a religion and not a science...

and not only that, but the models used are well known to be inadequate.

they do not factor .... for example...

- UV on the ozone layer and the Suns UV output variation.

-the fact that weather systems pass electric current from and to the ionosphere

I am happy to be enlightened on these points.

At the moment I get the impression that AGW is an exact model of the emperor who had no clothes. That fable seems to be spot on.



To: Eric who wrote (1171551)10/16/2019 4:30:10 PM
From: ryanaka  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572632
 
To understand and solve any technical problem, one needs to simplify the problem -- first to the zeroth order.

Then modify it to include the first order terms.

When people start bringing in the second order and higher order, the climate debate with idiot Republicans results.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News