Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (37740)	1/23/1998 12:23:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Pugs, Would this second investor possibly be one of the alledged short sellers?? <wink> Just having some fun... but I do wish to continue to express concern that I believe the sharholders need some answers from RMIL's management relative to total number of outstanding shares (documented evidence from management). I still feel that, IF there is a 5-6 million share short position, it would greatly be to the company's advantage to cut a private deal with them to raise capital for the company on the backs of those who held their shares in certificate form. I think it is time that management begin sticking its neck on the line in the same manner that its shareholders have. Any private deal would completely undercut the ability to squeeze the stock and since the company has not "officially" acknowledged the short position, shareholder left holding the bag would have little legal recourse (my opinion). They've asked and received a lot from their shareholders. I just hope that shareholders will return the "favor" and ask for similiar commitment from management. Regards, Ron

To: Pugs who wrote (37740)	1/23/1998 12:45:00 AM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

>>The second investor isn't even a 'reality' yet....<< Then why talk about it?? TC

To: Pugs who wrote (37740)	1/23/1998 12:59:00 AM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Pugs, >>the backorders for RMCWater<< This 'backorder' thing keeps coming up over and over....primarily from you. What proof do you have of this order? As I have stated before, this 'backorder,' supposedly from Taiwan, would mean the purchase of at least 2 bottles of water for each citizen of that country.....that's hard to believe. TC