Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (1172077)	10/18/2019 12:59:17 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572893

dumb lying anonymous asshole eric. An increase of one part in 10,000 of C02 in the atmosphere would decrease the extinction distance of IR wave number photons that are absorbed by CO2. That would heat that CO2 and that heat would conduct to the other 99K+ molecules. That heat would expanse the gas and it would be lighter and thus rise working against gravity and it would expand undergoing Adiabatic cooling. Eventually it's companion H20 vapor would condense and freeze to ice crystals. Ice crystals that have thousands of times the emisivity of an equal mass of air molecules. The emissivity of a gas versus it pressure and or mass is not defined anywhere. Because it cannot be measured with any degree of accuracy. Any kid that took a high school physics class and had any comprehension of it's implications would know dumb lying anonymous asshole eric is in fact dumb lying anonymous asshole eric