Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (1172852)	10/21/2019 5:34:55 PM
From: Jamie153	Respond to of 1571689

Destroy the lies and move on. Here's how we do it. "Earth-orbiting satellites and other technological advances have enabled scientists to see the big picture, collecting many different types of information about our planet and its climate on a global scale. This body of data, collected over many years, reveals the signals of a changing climate. The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century. 2 Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA. There is no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response."

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (1172852)	10/21/2019 5:37:31 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571689

There is no science evidence that CO2 has or is causing any of the increase in global temperatures via a greenhouse gas mechanism. Hey Tommie......here's some science that even an elekrikal injunear will understand. If somehow you could replace the air in your attic with pure CO2, do you think the temp in your house would rise or fall?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (1172852)	10/21/2019 5:44:39 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 1571689

There is no science evidence that you can tell the difference between your rear end and Uranus.

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (1172852)	10/21/2019 6:43:46 PM
From: maceng2	1 Recommendation Recommended By PKRBKR Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571689

Ref: "There is no science evidence that CO2 has or is causing any of the increase in global temperatures via a greenhouse gas mechanism" Your right. far as I can tell. At the moment there is some evidence to show that temperatures have risen from some arbitrary point. The IPCC have decided that the only reason this temperature is higher then the other temperature.. is because CO2 levels have risen. There could be a hundred or so other mechanism's causing said temperature difference but the IPCC have decided no... only CO2. It's pure conjecture on my part, but I am sure the big money that is pushing the current agenda is ensuring that they have large investments in all the possible outcomes. They want the public to be aware of "CO2 induced global warming" only, they have mandated that only evidence is delivered that shows CO2 induced global warming. If a cold period ensues... well they own all the oil anyway. Why anyone should discount the Sun in any climate study just amazes me too. Not only that but there are clear signs of many climate cycles of various lengths from just a few years out to several thousand years. We are still seeing the effects of throwing off the last Ice age, it really does puzzle me why the IPCC does not acknowledge these potential variations before declaring CO2 induced climate emergencies, and all of the expense that goes with it. Judith Curry is in the news again. Oh wow... she says some things that have been mentioned already... ... and she really is a professional in her field. "Solar indirect effects and multi-decadal oscillations of large scale ocean circulations have been effectively ignored in interpreting the causes of the recent warming." fabiusmaximus.com also from 2017... Something for those who wish to know more... For example what does "Equilibrium climate sensitivity" mean? Read on... Climate Models for the Layman with Dr. Judith Curry youtube.com Sadly there are lots of examples where skilled and able climate scientists get their careers trashed if they don't tow the CO2 induced global warming line.