SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Zonagen (zona) - good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1991)1/23/1998 7:46:00 AM
From: Myron David Kor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7041
 
Keith good recent posts. Blood levels really seem to tell the story. Glad you straightened out your mistakes,that had a few of us puzzled.
Pay no attention to Willie. Bidder's last post says it all re hoping
Asensio and Wexler will be able to crush this stock before it has really been given an opportunity to prove itself.



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1991)1/23/1998 6:25:00 PM
From: Tunica Albuginea  Respond to of 7041
 
Linda, this is what I was referring to earlier today in my post#2003 , stating
that there are other ways of identifying the medical competence of a physician other than a in a medical quizz. ANd Bill's post is a perfect example:

""<<Contrary to my posting #1928, vasomax is in fact a pill which is swallowed. ." I apologize to those of you who I unintentionally led to believe otherwise.>>

I say, that if I were a patient, I would be VERY hesitant to visit a physician or brker/analyst who does not know such a basic thing as the difference between a pill and a a sub-lingual formulation.This is like that surgeon in Florida who amputated the wrong leg! I also find VERY difficult believing that DrRubin's mistake was inadvertent.
He repeatedly made the statement that the preparation was absorbed
sublingually. That then would obbligate us to believe SEVERAL totally
IMPROBABLE facts, OCCURING AT THE SAME TIME:
a) that HE NEVER read that Vasomax was a pill you swallow.
b) that at the same time he DISTINCTLY read somewhere tha this is a sublingual preparation
c) That he never QUESTIONED in ALL these ED conferences that he attended, the fact that NOBODY said that this was a sublingual preparation, thus prompting him to study the matter further

I am stating to suspect ulterior motives or even smell a rat.
TA