To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (1173624 ) 10/25/2019 2:53:38 PM From: RetiredNow Read Replies (2) | Respond to Actually, you are wrong about Tulsi and impeachment. Hannity did a darned good job interviewing Tulsi. Here's what she actually said on Fox News in the Hannity interview :Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, echoed the frustrations of many Republicans over a perceived lack of transparency in the handling of the impeachment inquiry led by House Democrats.Appearing on “Hannity” Thursday, the presidential candidate said she originally supported the inquiry, but she stressed the need for transparency.“I don't know what's going on in those closed doors,” Gabbard said. “We as members of Congress do not have access to the information that's being shared. I think the American people deserve to know exactly what the facts are, what the evidence is being presented as this inquiry goes on.”She also expressed concerns that a hyper-partisan impeachment inquiry would “tear apart” the country. “I've long expressed my concern about going through impeachment proceedings in a very, very partisan way because it will only further tear apart an already divided country.” It's all moot anyway, Elizabeth Warren is going to be the nominee that Trump will have to beat. Trump will win and it will be a very amusing set of debates to watch. I can't wait until the fun begins.Endorsement Time: Soros Says Warren "Most Qualified To Be President" New York Times She has emerged as the clear-cut person to beat ," he said. "I don’t take a public stance, but I do believe that she is the most qualified to be president. "Times' Andrew Ross Sorkin pointed out that the ultra-wealthy, including his Wall St. peers think Warren's taxation of the rich and tight regulatory plans for banks would be a giant threat to the "capitalistic system in which he made his riches," Soros said he disagreed - reiterating his support of a wealth tax.Pausing for a moment, he looked like he was searching for the right words to explain himself. “A financier makes people suspicious,” he said. “And it does create a moral problem for me. As I became so successful, it basically put a self-imposed constraint on me that actually interfered with making money.” Still, Mr. Soros batted away the idea that he and his Wall Street brethren had the political power and influence that was often ascribed to them — or at least that they would have less power in this election cycle than in previous ones. “There are more Main Streets in America than there are Wall Streets. So I don’t think that Wall Street, other than being a source of money, will have its way in choosing the president.” - New York Times here
