Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Goldbug23 who wrote (6576)	1/23/1998 12:18:00 PM
From: IngotWeTrust	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116759

Thanks, Jim...thot that post was rather a masterpiece mahselfen(grin) O/49r

To: Goldbug23 who wrote (6576)	1/23/1998 12:39:00 PM
From: Zardoz	Respond to of 116759

Goldbug23 You don't deserve free speech. You don't know how to use it. If I walk into a drinking bar and start talking derivatives and how they effect the price of gold due to Asian failure, I deserve the looks I'll get. Cause the bar is the place to share drinking attitudes, not gold comments. But if I can show how the derivative effect bank faliures, gold, and thus an increase in drinking will result. Than touche. I'd be right on. The point is that few posts that day showed any connection between Clinton and the dollar {or Gold}, but where comments of how many chicks he's screwed. PS: I don't see the need for people to go around patting other on the back, just cause you agree with someone's comment. This is the lowest form of nepotism. The desire to be in a cliche, by riding someone elses comments. So now I'll go silent, and allow this thread to deteriate to that of the idle barroom chatter. Forgive one person on trying to bring people back into posting about GOLD, as opposed to WAR, SEX, and RUMOURS.