SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: chronicle who wrote (1174631)10/31/2019 9:44:12 AM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
Thomas A Watson

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574216
 
Obama: Nihilist or Just Incompetent? By Victor Davis HansonPosted By Ruth King on October 5th, 2015

URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson/obama-nihilist-or-just-incompetent/

Three things so far have saved Obama’s otherwise unfortunate tenure; all came over his own objections.

One, after the 2010 midterm tsunami, the newly elected House Republicans put a lid on spending — ratified by the wins of 2014. Sequestration is a crude blunderbuss and slashed defense, but it at least slowed down Obama’s disastrous serial $1 trillion-plus budget deficits. In spending terms, it certainly has vastly reduced the government’s share of GDP. We know that because Obama occasionally brags of falling deficits, as if to say, “Thank you for not letting me be entirely myself.” When he leaves office, we will have $20 trillion in debt and nearly 100 million permanently out of the work force, as well as uncontrolled and unaddressed entitlement spending on life support through zero-interest rates. But we will still be alive for now, thanks to sequestration. Shutting down the government may have been politically unwise (or not — given the 2014 midterm elections [1]), but it kept the debt financeable.

Then there is energy. Obama once bragged of sky-high electricity costs to come — echoed by Steven Chu’s dream [2] of European-level gas prices. Obama mocked “drill, baby, drill” and claimed it was no solution to the energy crisis, as he tabled Keystone and put millions of acres of federal lands de facto off the market for energy exploration. He tried to “bankrupt” the coal industry [3]. The EPA became a rogue agency [4]. Almost all his crony-capitalist Solyndra-like projects failed.

And? Gasoline and natural gas prices have plunged, thanks to fracking and horizontal drilling.

Private-sector entrepreneurs were apparently energized by new technologies and the specter of profits in an uncertain oil market — and a combative new sense of self-reliance that they were on their own without much government approval. Grimy, forgotten men on rigs have saved Americans trillions in lower energy prices and import costs — and all despite, not because of, Obama.

Third, Obamism is proving finite. Yes, this is the Obama era of intolerant imposition of gay marriage by court fiat, the selling of fetal limbs by Planned Parenthood, Climate Change McCarthyism, Black Lives Matter / Hands Up, Don’t Shoot mythologies, “Punish Our Enemies” ethnic smearing, state-ministry journalism, and Sanctuary City neo-Confederate nullification [5]. But in the process, Obama has nearly destroyed the Democratic Party — and all but turned it over either to a veritable crook and has-been or a 73-year-old self-described socialist. He lost both houses of Congress. The legislatures and governorships are overwhelmingly Republican. He turned off millions of working-class old-time Reagan Democrats. His new paradigm — demagogue minorities to vote en bloc in record numbers by any means necessary and screw those turned off by his separatist rhetoric — is probably not transferrable to other Democratic candidates.

The present field — Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Martin O’Malley, Jim Webb, and possibly John Kerry, Al Gore, and Jerry Brown — are the sort of old white folks that Obama has insisted were ancient history. Apparently, after Obama the idea of a mellifluous but inexperienced and untried identity-politics candidate turned off the sclerotic Democratic Party bosses or its apparent race-obsessed king-makers, given there are no Obama 2.0 candidates in the field. The subtext of the Democratic field — at least until Joe Biden enters — appears to be that Obama will be as much praised as he is forgotten. Liberals are strangely quiet about the race/class/gender make-up of their field, but apparently not eager to see the old racialist warhorses Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson return to the campaign trail, or a new face like Cory Booker or maybe Michelle Obama in Hillary Clinton-fashion.

Otherwise, the Obama record is mostly disasters. He promised over 20 times not to act unconstitutionally and issue blanket amnesties. Then he destroyed the idea of a border, both physically and ideologically — and taught the Democratic Party that the salvation for its otherwise unpopular agenda was demographic, as in welcoming in millions of illegal aliens who would form a new constituency for statism [6]. To restore a shred of border security will incur institutionalized charges of racist, nativist, and xenophobe. The only brake on immigration will be bewildered Latino activists who fear that vast increases in illegal Asian immigration will trump their own paradigm, and thus they will call for some sort of immigration enforcement. Obama has left us with an existential question: if there are no borders and no immigration laws, at what point does illegal immigration cease? 100 million foreign-born residents? 150 million? 20 million illegal aliens? 40? 60? When the southern U.S. becomes Mexico or Guatemala, will Guatemalans or Mexicans still wish to come? When Sidwell Friends become bilingual or the Menlo School has translators on campus? Once the law is null and void, the question becomes again philosophical: who is to say that anyone cannot come, once you have said that almost everyone can come? Apparently, the only person we don’t want in this country is someone applying legally for citizenship from a Germany or Denmark, with an MBA, $250,000 in the bank, and perfect English.

Foreign policy will take a decade of recovery. We are seeing a historic Russian, Iranian, Syrian, radical Shiite/Hezbollah, and Hamas arc sweeping across the Middle East.

It has little to do with destroying ISIS, which will be allowed by Putin and Iran to continue a bit to provide blood-sport in its killing of Westerners and their supporters. The new Axis instead will be anchored by a nuclear Iran, and an expeditionary army of Iranian-backed shock troops and terrorists, energized by Russian weapons and air and naval support. Add up the daily oil-export potential of Russia, Iran, and Iraq, and then factor in the clout that the new coalition will wield against the Sunni Gulf states. Consider also China’s interests. The result is that we are witnessing the birth of a new paradigm in the oil-rich Middle East that will make OPEC’s cartel appear amateurish.

Afghanistan is going the way of Iraq. To appreciate those twin disasters, imagine getting out of Korea for a 1956 reelection talking point and allowing the North to reabsorb what thousands of American lives had saved. Or perhaps imagine Truman as Obama leaving Japan about 1950 to allow the postwar Japanese to work things out with the Communist Chinese next door.

The only mystery about the disasters in Afghanistan, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Yemen, and our new hostility to Israel and the Gulf states, was whether Obama was incompetent and timid, or a conniving nihilist eager to reduce the Middle East to an anti-American wasteland.

Again, Obama leaves us with a philosophical question: what will the world look like without any U.S. leadership? Bellum omnium contra omnes [7]? Putin’s new Russian Union? A Chinese Pacific? A Mediterranean of dinghies and rowboats? At what point does the present chaos become apocalyptic? When flights are cancelled to Dubai? When Iranian rockets and terrorists battle Israeli F-16s? When Munich looks like Mogadishu? When Putin takes Tallinn?

Take Obamacare. Only the incompetence and impracticality of the Affordable Care Act will render it irrelevant. After visiting a number of doctors’ waiting rooms in the impoverished San Joaquin Valley, I can attest that most of Obamacare patients have little idea of what a deductible, copayment or premium is, have less desire to find out, and prefer going back to the ER or free federal and state health clinics whenever possible. Does signing up once for Obamacare ensure that the user continues to pay premiums on time and has cash for deductibles? And if not, then what?

Otherwise, most who had their own insurance just shrug that it is now far more expensive for less care, and move on. They are apparently relieved that higher costs for their plans are worth them not devolving entirely into Obamacare coverage.

Government has now adopted a Third-World ethos. Review the Secret Service. It has gone rogue, leaking old files on congressional watchdogs [8]. The IRS is an extension of the White House; in brilliant fashion Lois Lerner left a legacy of deterrence: something like, “I am still not in jail [9], and you all are still worried that there are thousands like me burrowed in the IRS watching you.”

What exactly were cabinet heads Lisa Jackson and Hilda Solis doing when they so hastily left? Is NASA still doing Islamic outreach [10] or finally trying to get us our own rocket [11]?

Where did all the rogues and incompetents at the GSA, ICE, NSA, TSA, and VA come from? Did they simply come out of the woodwork once Obama set the tone that bureaucrats are to be ACORN and SEIU-like community organizers? When did the goal of a 24-year-old college graduate become a sinecure as a government bureaucrat, replete with de facto lifelong tenure, guaranteed pay raises, and a retirement system that pays out annually more than does a private $4-million 401K without the worry?

Was all this due to incompetence or nihilism?

Who knows or cares? The only mystery left is how much damage the last gasp of 2016 will bring? Abroad, our enemies will rightly conclude that 2016 is about the time to cash in the last of their winnings and leave the table. And at home, we will have a year to go of petulance, spite, and snark because we have finally rejected the messiah sent into the world to save us.

Article printed from Works and Days: http://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson




To: chronicle who wrote (1174631)10/31/2019 10:14:51 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574216
 
Most voters across six battleground states oppose impeaching and removing Donald Trump - Washington Times 8 times



To: chronicle who wrote (1174631)10/31/2019 10:59:29 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1574216
 
Busted. There Are 11 FISA Judges, Guess How Many Obama Appointed… 8 conservativepost



To: chronicle who wrote (1174631)10/31/2019 11:02:59 AM
From: longnshort3 Recommendations

Recommended By
dave rose
FJB
Tenchusatsu

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1574216
 
When a Canadian Explained to Me the Horrors of Socialized Medicine
By Bonnie Cohen and Howard Sachs
I was in line at Costco — that wonderful example of American liberty, capitalism, the profit motive, and what it brings us — namely, a bounty of wonderful goods and services we freely choose, all at low cost and high quality. Costco is an example of what's right in America. So why not pass the time and strike up a conversation with the fellow customer in front of me?

I heard from her accent she was from Canada. I asked her about socialized medicine. I said to her that all the men and women of the American Left (the Democratic Party) tell us to look to Canada, to a big powerful government as a model of what we should seek to run our own health care here in America. This articulate, open, and wise woman responded and warned me about such nonsense. She reminded me of what is fast fading in America: a people in love with liberty and all that it brings. Millions in America now tragically and foolishly follow the lead of the freedom- and wealth-destroying Left. Its propaganda, false promises, and foolish ideas are alluring but in the end destructive. Their values would destroy the Costcos of America. They are well on the road to destroying our great medical system.

The woman said (paraphrased), "Even though you're getting close to complete government control of health care, you American's don't know how good you still have it here. If you really want to know, come to Canada, where the state now runs everything. It's ugly and scary."

She elaborated. She told me the tragic story of her sister, who had worked as a nurse in a hospital. She experienced some serious symptoms that needed further tests. She was put in a long queue to have an MRI. Her sister worked as a nurse. She could have pulled strings to get ahead of others waiting in the long line. She chose not to take advantage. Finally, seven months later, the scan was performed. The test revealed a cancer that was no longer treatable. My Costco line-mate said, "This happens all the time in our state-run Canadian system. You in America, you don't hear about these things, do you?"

Why would we? We no longer essentially have a free press. Our press, for the most part, is now the Democratic Party Progressive Left Press, and such facts would not fit the narrative of the wonderful Big-Government "free health care for all" propaganda.

The woman from Canada continued, "The people in your country are incredibly foolish thinking that Big Government is the way to go with health care or just about anything else in life."

I told my brother, a doctor here in America for 35 years, about what this woman said. He responded with the following. "That woman is absolutely right. It's tragic that Canadians now have to teach Americans about the greatness of liberty and free-market capitalism. At the bottom of all this Medicare for All business is the weakness it shows that resides to varying degrees in all of us. It is the weakness of ignorance about liberty, history, and economics. It is also the weakness of not wanting to grow up. And that combination of ignorance, foolishness, and childishness only wrecks the adult world in which we live. Socialism in medicine or anything else is not kind, not compassionate, and not progressive. What it produces is mean, nasty, dark, destructive, and regressive."

When you give into all this weakness and hand your freedom and money over to these politicians, of course you'll get some good from it. Who wouldn't get something after spending several hundred billion or a few trillion dollars a year on health care? But that's not the question mature, intelligent, free American adults should be asking. They should be asking the question, at what cost do I get such stuff, and could I get as much or more of it at much lower costs and higher quality?

The answer is clear. If you pick the Big Government control way, the way that removes freedom and profit, what you get is destruction of our American liberty, our medical system, and our wealth. You get in medicine massive costs and waste of money, low quality, the end of customer service, rationing, shortages, withering of innovation, and lack of excellence. It's plain and simple. That's the way of the adult real world. Such paths have been chosen in many places and at many times in history. The experiment has been run over and over, and it's always the same. It doesn't matter if it's England, Canada, Cuba, India and China.

No Bernie, Beto, Ocasio-Cortez, Pete, Elizabethm or Kamala, no matter how passionate, loud, compassionate, and aggressive they may sound, is going to change the laws of nature, the laws of freedom, or the laws of economics. No matter how much they or their supporters wish upon a star, government-run health care will always bring you exorbitant waste; expense; and the grimy, depressing Department of Motor Vehicles–type of care and service. This is where you meet the blurry-eyed, tired, worn bureaucrats and salaried overworked and underpaid docs and nurses barely looking at you when you show up. This is the medical care where they'll tell you to "take a number, Lady; have a seat, and if you've got any complaints, write your congressman." This is the medical care where you and your doctor are to basically shut up, get in line, fill out the forms, and do what you're told by faceless unaccountable bureaucrats. This is what millions cheer for as they "Felt the Bern?" I get nauseated thinking of it.

This is also why with government now controlling most of American medicine, it costs a family $20,000 for an insurance policy that should cost $5,000. It's why an MRI scan routinely costs $2,000 when it should cost about $500. It's why a heart surgery that costs $100,000 should, with government out of the way, maybe cost a fraction of that.

So yes, indeed, the Canadian lady at Costco had it spot on. America should flat-out reject this Medicare for All business and, in fact, demand we get the tangled massive web of government control already in place out of our lives, doctors' offices, and hospitals. But humans are flawed creatures. Childishness and ignorance inhabit all of us to varying degrees — always do, always will. Our founders understood that. It's why they made it illegal in the Constitution for government to grab the power to control health care. But the men and women of the Left don't care about the law, especially one written by white, Christian, cis-gendered males 250 years ago. They care about their ideology of power and control. Giving into this never works out well...ever.



To: chronicle who wrote (1174631)11/1/2019 5:14:42 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574216
 
Why are you against kids?