Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (1175331)	11/2/2019 7:29:12 PM
From: Winfastorlose	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571525

A judge in Washington on Thursday dismissed the suit filed in December by the former six-term Maricopa County sheriff, alleging that CNN, the Huffington Post and Rolling Stone published inaccuracies that hurt his chances to win a US Senate seat and to procure necessary funding from the “Republican establishment and donors,” the Arizona Republic reports. But Arpaio’s suit failed to prove actual malice, US District Judge Royce Lamberth wrote in his opinion, while acknowledging the burden of doing so is a “difficult one to meet.” https://nypost.com/2019/11/01/joe-arpaio-loses-300m-defamation-lawsuit-against-cnn-huffpost-rolling-stone/?utm_source=facebook_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site+buttons&utm_campaign=site+buttons I will translate that for you, zombie. It means Arpaio may have been correct but since he could not prove that they lied in an attempt to intentionally harm him, he has no case due to 1st Amendment protections for the press.