SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: greenspirit who wrote (16453)1/23/1998 11:55:00 AM
From: BlueCrab  Respond to of 108807
 
Michael -- <<I just don't think he deserves an escuse, that's all.>>

He doesn't need an excuse. Many people have the same "problem", equating sexual prowess (and need) with paternal acceptance. Look back on it; many famous, powerful men had less than satisfactory relationships with their FATHERS. "Look what I can do, Daddy" is their unspoken boast. Women, too; an unsatisfactory paternal link can cause the "See, Daddy, HE likes me!" reaction.

THe sexual part of the human mind has far more dimensions than we know, especially for those with unsatisfactory or uncertain pasts. THAT'S one of many reasons your kids are lucky, Michael, as I hope the rest of our kids are.

And, BTW, Alexa does support immorality; check out her "Larry Flynt was RIGHT!" T-shirt...



To: greenspirit who wrote (16453)1/23/1998 1:49:00 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Well, it isn't exactly an excuse, I view it as a reason. It does put powerful men in the position of having to be even more moral than the average man because I think the temptations are so much greater. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, I think this applies to the morality of the individual, don't you?