Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (16459)	1/23/1998 11:31:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Janice, the way I understand how it went off is Tripp was going to testify that she knew of the Lewinsky affair. Tripp called Lewinsky to tell her that,so that she would be prepared when starr supeaoned her. Why did Tripp feel she ought to go telling tales to Jones's lawyers? And there is the question of hearsay evidence, raised here last night. Was Tripp then encouraged to tape the calls so that the "evidence" wouldn't be hearsay? What sort of person needlessly betrays a supposed friend in this way? And Starr didn't initially subpeona Lewinsky; Jones's lawyers did. All of this began because the Jones contingent was trying to gather evidence (which in the end may be inadmissable in court) which would support allegations that Clinton had affairs outside his marriage. It's about Jones's civil suit, not saving the nation. I say Tripp has an angle. Someone should check her bank accounts.