SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (16467)1/23/1998 11:23:00 AM
From: j g cordes  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Janice, what's the law in the state she was wire tapped (without her knowledge). It seems to me, Starr knew it was illegal, which is why he immediately sent Tripp out again to get usable evidence.

If the original tapes were illegal then his grounds for sending her out again were unfounded. The question boils down to Starrs broadly defined powers to investigate whatever he wants and not have to respond as a responsible law enforcement officer, only to the pursuit he's involved with.



To: Janice Shell who wrote (16467)1/23/1998 11:53:00 AM
From: jim kelley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I agree with with you. If she cracks under Starr's pressure she will look like another weak willed bimbo. The constitution says she does not have to testify against herself. She should stick to her fifth amendment rights and do the talk show route to give herself a public face other than the one Starr is going to give her.

The taping was done in Maryland and it was illegal as well as immoral.
She should sue Tripp in Maryland for damages.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News