SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: teevee who wrote (20024)11/6/2019 9:31:41 AM
From: gg cox3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Cogito Ergo Sum
kidl
onepath

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37416
 
Alberta squander,, boondoggle...how well would they fare isolated on their own??

“”[4] The Fraser Institute report compared the Alberta Heritage Fund to Norway and Alaska's NRR funds and argued that Alberta's was significantly "smaller than others because of its relative under-funding and chronic withdrawals of most income from the fund."[17]:9 Alaska for example continued to deposit 25 percent of its NRR from 1982- 2011 and Norway contributed 100 percent.




If Alberta had followed the Alaskan formula, by 2011 the Heritage Fund would have had $42.4 billion instead of $9.1 billion. By the Norway rules, Alberta would have had $121.9 billion by 2011.[3][17]:9””

en.wikipedia.org

open.alberta.ca



To: teevee who wrote (20024)11/6/2019 6:16:38 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Respond to of 37416
 
I do not disagree... but you need global access for oil...

without that.. you are like gg's metaphor