Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (142641)	11/6/2019 4:45:51 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 356169

In other words, you are just guessing and have nothing like proof. Per usual.

To: i-node who wrote (142641)	11/6/2019 5:28:38 PM
From: puborectalis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 356169

GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham on Wednesday suggested that President Donald Trump's policy toward Ukraine is so "incoherent" that he's "incapable" of engaging in a quid pro quo in his dealings with the country. Graham has shifted in his defense of the president several times as the impeachment inquiry has ramped up.In late September, Graham said evidence of a quid pro quo involving the president and Ukraine does "not exist."

To: i-node who wrote (142641)	11/6/2019 5:51:44 PM
From: Lane3	1 Recommendation Recommended By bentway Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 356169

if you can’t point to one thing he’s done that consider to be positive you are definitely one. That's not valid. Hate is an emotion. Opposition is a rational posture. As is disapproval. As is disagreement. Or support impeachment today but can’t define an actual criminal act, you’re one. That's not valid. Impeachment does not require a criminal act. If you oppose him because of a Melania. Huh? If you supported his impeachment beforehand took office, you’re one. I'll give you that one (even though one could easily have predicted before he took office from observing his posture and temperament that he would likely do something impeachable).