SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j g cordes who wrote (16474)1/23/1998 1:04:00 PM
From: Grainne  Respond to of 108807
 
I agree totally with everything you say about touch being vital to the health of human beings. I just think it is more of a concern on an anthropological basis than a political one, and don't understand much of a connection with Clinton. He is a prolific hugger, and I bet he touches a lot more flesh than most people. Still, hugging and physical contact are not exactly the same thing as sexual contact, and to some degree meet different human needs.



To: j g cordes who wrote (16474)1/23/1998 2:23:00 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Then of course you want women home to nurture and cuddle their infants so they will not suffer this horrible fate? I agree with you. How will we make women do this? I do it volunatily, but would love to see other women forced to do this as I think they are morally repugnant for leaving their babaies and rushing off to work. (And I don't believe for a minute tat they all need to do it because of economics.)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News