Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : LVB Investment Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Leo Mitkievicz who wrote (868)	1/23/1998 12:02:00 PM
From: Vanni Resta	Respond to of 1253

I thought Schlumberge missed their numbers, which is a big no-no. I agree, though, that many of the service stocks are way over sold and still look good. I never went into them too big, though, because it really is to some degree a play on the price of oil. And who can predict that?! Hi Jon Tara!! How ya doin' man? Good to see you again. Nice of you to stop by. I know you are looking. Hahahahaha! Happy Investing! Vanni

To: Leo Mitkievicz who wrote (868)	1/23/1998 4:14:00 PM
From: Vanni Resta	Respond to of 1253

Hey Leo, Have you seen the Creaf thread lately? No reason you should, but it is funny how they complain like crazy about me, then when I don't post, they go looking for me all over SI (hi Jon!) and respond to my messages in other threads where they find them. Or else they refer to my messages back in the Creaf thread, showing that they've been looking for me all over the place. They don't seem like they really know what they want. Even stranger is that they think a discussion of whether an earnings revision occured, or even whether a brokerage that covers the stock really exists, is a waste of time. I thought SI was meant to be a place to talk about investing. If so, you would think the analyst community is at least of some importance. Happy Investing! Vanni