To: cacmed who wrote (12416 ) 11/7/2019 11:51:05 PM From: HardToFind 3 RecommendationsRecommended By drkaz Kirk © mattstat
Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12873 Straynut can't come to grips with his complete lack of analytic ability and at least offer an apology to those who he assured that he and his rich college buddy had reviewed the unusual aspects of the two entwined companies, and that their analysis showed there was no problem with the setup. Just my opinion... This is a stock bulletin board. People don't even use their real names, and with all of the trolling and sniping, rightly so. But it is a place where we share and defend opinions about a stock. Often we are wrong. Why would anyone trust and/or take actions with their money based upon what is written here, without doing what they consider "due" diligence? They shouldn't. If they did, I hope their education didn't cost more than they could afford to lose.News flash: Your money is your responsibility. Your investment/speculation decisions are yours, and we should all own our decisions. I don't think people who might have been wrong about Diwan, his ethics and/or his science...need to apologize to anyone here if they were/are expressing their honest views. If you think Straynut was dishonest, explain why. (I strongly believe he put his money on the line, and he probably lost more money than you by believing in Diwan.) If you think he was simply wrong, suck it up and own the consequences for your own actions. Shaming people for making incorrect forward-looking statements...I'm not really a fan. If he wants to apologize for being wrong, it's his call. What we all do with our investment decisions going forward are our own decisions, but I hope we have all learned something we want to take away from this experience.