SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (142971)11/8/2019 2:19:21 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 356075
 
Is this worse than spitting?



To: i-node who wrote (142971)11/9/2019 12:07:16 AM
From: Sam2 Recommendations

Recommended By
CentralParkRanger
Wharf Rat

  Respond to of 356075
 
You don't look very hard, do you? Always making comments that are simply, demonstrably ... wrong. You just make stuff up all the time that you believe ought to be right whether it is or it isn't.

re:
It is funny there is no criticism from the Left about Citizens United anymore. After Democrats have raised and spent more Citizens United money in every election year since that decision, I guess it doesn't seem so bad anymore.

Democrats introduce constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United
By Jordain Carney - 07/30/19 01:27 PM EDT

thehill.com

Senate Democrats introduced a constitutional amendment on Tuesday to undo the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court decision.

A group of Democrats, led by Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.), and progressive activists rallied outside the Supreme Court to unveil the amendment, which faces an unlikely path to being ratified.

"Few decisions in the 200 and some odd years of this republic have threatened our democracy like Citizens United. People say they want to get rid of the swamp. Citizens United is the embodiment of the swamp," Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said at the rally.

Schumer added that "overturning Citizens United is probably more important than any other single thing we could do to preserve this great and grand democracy."

Democrats pledged that if they took control of the Senate during the 2020 election, they would bring legislation overturning Citizens United up for a vote.

"We reported this amendment to the floor [in 2014]. What happened to it? A [Senate Majority Leader Mitch] McConnell [R-Ky.] filibuster happened to it. ... With a new leader by the name of Schumer in the Senate, we can be sure that it won't be a filibuster stopping us," said Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the No. 2 Senate Democrat.

The 2010 Supreme Court ruling prohibited the government from limiting spending by companies, nonprofit organizations and unions on political campaign advertisements. The court's majority wrote that such provisions would inhibit freedom of speech.

The Senate Democratic amendment would let Congress and states set rules on spending and money in elections.

But to be added as an amendment to the Constitution, the Democratic proposal would need to be approved by two-thirds of both the House and Senate and be approved by three-fourths of the states.

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) introduced his own amendment to nix Citizens United in May.

"The Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United overturned decades of legal precedent and has enabled billions in dark money to pour into our elections," Schiff said in a statement.