Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (143402)	11/11/2019 2:17:58 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 361045

>> I saw that some R or other suggested the whistle blower and Biden's son but neither of then has direct knowledge of the matter. So YOU do not believe Hunter Biden's relationship with the company is questionable, and it has nothing to do with this? Crap. You're not even trying to honest here. This ENTIRE thing is about whether Trump illegally withheld money in exchange for an investigation of Biden, or whether Trump was entirely OBLIGATED to demand an investigation of Biden. And you say Biden has no direct knowledge?" What are you thinking? Biden is the central witness here. The FIRST person who should be testifying. If Biden cannot show his involvement was appropriate, or at least that it wasn't corrupt, then there is no wrongdoing on Trump's part. Period. You and I do disagree over whether it is impeachable anyway. But if there is ANY chance of an impeachable offense having occurred, Biden's employment with Burisma MUST have been for non-corrupt purposes. If he was hired for his name (which there is pretty sold proof of) then the entire thing is off: it was a corrupt purpose and Trump would have been outrageously remiss in not pushing for an investigation of Burisma.