Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (143418)	11/11/2019 3:45:46 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362493

>> He seems to have operated that way for a while. Did they get it? It doesn't matter. I don't think it would be criminal. But it is corrupt. And Trump would be well within his rights, even obligated, to withhold the payment to Ukraine on suspicion of corruption. Particularly if it appeared the prosecutor was not investigating because of the US VP's son being on the BoD. Doesn't whether there was in fact corruption. Only that there was an appearance, and I cannot conceive of anyone thinking otherwise. While the investigation is obviously a political ploy, had it had any justification at all, this would have slammed the door shut instantly. >> which was to extort a smaller, You keep using the word "extort" but I don't think you know what it means.