Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1177726)	11/13/2019 4:59:10 PM
From: pocotrader	3 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 longz rdkflorida2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575183

the Holocaust deniers are truly the scum of the earth, there are many videos of veterans describing what they saw and many video's and pictures showing the poor victims.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1177726)	11/13/2019 6:54:24 PM
From: FJB	1 Recommendation Recommended By Maple MAGA Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575183

YOUR FELLOW PERVERT AVENATTI FACING 50+ YEARS ON JUST ONE OF THE CASES HE FACES Avenatti faces 50+ years in prison if convicted on charges of wire fraud and extortion in just one of the cases against him. BREAKING: Grand Jury Charges Michael Avenatti with Extortion and Wire Fraud in Nike Case by Cristina Laila November 13, 2019 Michael Avenatti AKA Creepy Porn Lawyer A federal grand jury on Wednesday charged Michael Avenatti with extortion and wire fraud in the case where he was charged with attempting to extort millions of dollars from Nike. According to the complaint, Avenatti threatened to hold a press conference to announce misconduct by Nike unless the athletic apparel company hired Avenatti and his co-conspirator to conduct an internal investigation for over $20 million. Avenatti faces three charges. “A federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment today against Michael Avenatti in the SDNY case in which he is charged with attempting to extort millions from Nike, per court filings. The superseder drops the conspiracy charges & adds 1 count of honest services wire fraud,” reported CNN’s Erica Orden. A federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment today against Michael Avenatti in the SDNY case in which he is charged with attempting to extort millions from Nike, per court filings. The superseder drops the conspiracy charges & adds 1 count of honest services wire fraud — erica orden (@eorden) November 13, 2019 As previously reported, Avenatti was arrested in New York on federal extortion charges, Nicolas Biase, with the United States Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York announced in March of this year. Avenatti was arrested on charges related to a $20 million extortion scheme of Nike, according to federal authorities. A criminal complaint against Avenatti says he “devised a scheme to extort a company by means of an interstate communication by threatening to damage the company’s reputation if the company did not agree to make multi-million dollar payments to Avenatti and [co-conspirator], and further agree to pay an additional $1.5 million to a client of Avenatti’s.” Michael Avenatti, dubbed the ‘Creepy Porn Lawyer’ for representing porn star Stormy Daniels, has been in a downward spiral professionally and financially in the last year. Avenatti is no longer representing Stephanie Clifford AKA Stormy Daniels, but he left her with a hefty $293,052 judgment. Federal prosecutors in Los Angeles announced separate charges of wire fraud and bank fraud against Avenatti in March of this year as well. According to reports, Avenatti faces 50+ years in prison if convicted on charges of wire fraud and extortion in just one of the cases against him.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1177726)	11/13/2019 9:06:33 PM
From: FJB	1 Recommendation Recommended By Winfastorlose Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575183

CRACK ADDICT HUNTER BIDEN MUST BE INVESTIGATED, SAYS DEMORAT WITNESS KENT BACKFIRE: Democrat Impeachment Hearing Accidentally Makes Case for Hunter Biden Investigation ABC News HARIS ALIC13 Nov 20191,664 3:03 The impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump backfired on congressional Democrats Wednesday, when a star witness inadvertently made the case that Hunter Biden’s wheeling and dealing in Ukraine should be investigated. Testifying before the House Intelligence Committee on the opening day of the inquiry, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent admitted that U.S. officials had been urging the Ukrainian government for some time to explain why an investigation into Burisma Holdings, the eastern European oil and gas company that employed Hunter Biden on its board of directors, was shut down. “We’ve continued to press Ukrainian officials to answer for why allege corrupt prosecutors had closed [the] case,” Kent said. “We have until now got an unsatisfactory answer.” Kent, who has claimed former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani engineered the firing of the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine through a “campaign of slander,” is considered a key witness for congressional Democrats as they seek to prove the president’s conduct rises to the level of impeachment. On Wednesday, however, Kent inadvertently strengthened the argument that Republicans and the president, himself, have made that Hunter Biden’s conduct in Ukraine should be probed given his father’s role overseeing policy in the region and the allegations of corruption lodged against Burisma and its founder, Mykola Zlochevsky. It was on the latter front that Kent’s testimony proved particularly revealing. The state department official admitted he and his colleagues believed Zlochevsky “had stolen money” and the Ukrainian prosecutor charged with investigating him shut down the case after taking a bribe. When asked if he was in favor of the Ukrainian government reopening the probe into Bruisma and Zlochevsky, Kent asserted he would “love” to see such an action so it could become clear who was bribed and to what extent. Kent also asserted that Burisma had a “mixed business reputation” and Hunter Biden’s decision to join its board of directors had led him to raise concerns with former Vice President Joe Biden’s office in 2015. “In a briefing call with…the office of the Vice President…I raised my concern that Hunter Biden’s status as a [Burisma] board member could create the perception of a conflict of interest,” Kent testified. At the center of controversy is how and why Hunter Biden secured the appointment, which at times paid more than $83,000 a month. As Peter Schweizer, senior contributor at Breitbart News, detailed in his book, Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends, Hunter Biden had no prior experience with either the energy industry or Ukraine before joining Burisma in April 2014. Adding to concerns is the fact that at the time Hunter Biden joined Burisma, the company was seen as actively courting western leaders to prevent further scrutiny of its business practices. The same month Hunter Biden was tapped for the group’s board, the government of Great Britain froze accounts belonging to Zlochevsky under suspicion of money laundering. Zlochevsky, a former Ukrainian minister of natural resources, would later be accused of corruption for using his office to approve oil and gas licenses to companies under his control. A Ukrainian official with strong ties to Zlochevsky admitted in October the only reason that Hunter Biden secured the appointment was to “ protect” the company from foreign scrutiny. 2020 Election Politics 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Burisma Holdings Donald Trump George Kent House Intelligence Committee Hunter Biden impeachment inquiry Joe Biden Peter Schweizer Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends Ukraine

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1177726)	11/14/2019 1:12:38 AM
From: FJB	4 Recommendations Recommended By bruwin D.Austin locogringo Winfastorlose Read Replies (12) \| Respond to of 1575183

HOW CAN CRACK ADDICT HUNTER POSSIBLY AVOID TESTIFYING AFTER THIS? DEM WITNESS BACKFIRE George Kent: "After [becoming aware of #HunterBiden being on board of #Burisma], in a call with NSC staff in the @VP 's Office, in Feb. 2015, I raised my concern that Hunter’s status as board member could create the perception of a conflict of interest," George Kent: "After [becoming aware of #HunterBiden being on board of #Burisma], in a call with NSC staff in the @VP's Office, in Feb. 2015, I raised my concern that Hunter’s status as board member could create the perception of a conflict of interest,"https://t.co/cWChhALGS6 — Sara A. Carter (@SaraCarterDC) November 13, 2019