SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Grainne who wrote (16522)1/23/1998 7:05:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Respond to of 108807
 
Jim, my understanding of the taping is that regardles of whether Tripp's original tapes werre illegally made, the fact that Attorney General Reno and the panel of three federal judges they convened to authorize a wire-tap based on probable cause that a crime had been committed, makes that irrelevant at this point.

Not irrelevant to Tripp, if Lewinsky wants to bring suit for illegal wiretapping. Which she should do. She should also go after Starr & Company for entrapment.



To: Grainne who wrote (16522)1/23/1998 7:10:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Respond to of 108807
 
There has been a pattern in the Whitewater case of witnesses or involved parties clamming up, being offered jobs and financial support by people around the Clintons, etc.

Cite your "facts", please? If it were as clearcut as you seem to think, Ken Starr wouldn't have spent five years and $30 million trying unsuccessfully to make some dirt stick to the Clintons.

Again, you offer your own suppositions as "truth".


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News