To: Winfastorlose who wrote (1178496 ) 11/16/2019 12:34:41 PM From: Wharf Rat Read Replies (1) | Respond to "As Dr Soon explains and demonstrates, when the data doesn't fit, the climate alarmists just change the data."January 31, 2003: Astrophysicists Publish Heavily Criticized Paper Skeptical of Global Warming Climate Research. In their article, the two astrophysicists review the work of several scientists and argue that the twentieth century was not the warmest century during the last 1,000 years. [ SOON AND BALIUNAS, 2003 ] Their article is promoted widely by organizations and individuals funded by ExxonMobil (see Between 1998 and 2005 ) [ UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS, 2007, PP. 14 ] as well as by Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) who says the paper is proof that natural variability, not human activity, is the “overwhelming factor” influencing climate change. [ US CONGRESS, 7/28/2003 ] But after the paper is published, three of journal’s editors—including incoming editor-in-chief Hans von Storch—quit in protest. Storch, explaining his resignation, calls the paper “flawed” because “the conclusions are not supported by the evidence presented in the paper.” He adds that he suspects “some of the skeptics had identified Climate Research as a journal where some editors were not as rigorous in the review process as is otherwise common.” [ CHRONICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 9/5/2003 ] Additionally, 13 of the scientists cited in the paper publish a rebuttal saying that Soon and Baliunas seriously misinterpreted their research in the paper. [ AMMANN ET AL., 2003 ; AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 7/7/2003 ]After January 31, 2003: Scientist Who Wrote Article Skeptical of Global Warming Recruited by ExxonMobil-Funded Organizations UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS, 2007, PP. 15, 34-35 ]
